Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dbenham-webrtc-videomti-01

On 02/26/2013 10:57 AM, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) wrote:
> Interesting... http://bit.ly/15gL7Lw
> 
> (Which at least for me gave a page of 5 results, all of them pointers to
> your original mailing list posting or the agenda with the wrong link in it,
> none to the draft)
> 
> Matthew Kaufman
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
> [mailto:fluffy@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:54 AM To:
> Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE) Cc: <rtcweb@ietf.org> Subject: Re: Agenda time
> request for draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti
> 
> 
> sorry - I put the wrong draft name, it got updated to a -01
> 
> better link at
> 
> http://bit.ly/13fOrrZ
> 
> 
> On Feb 26, 2013, at 10:47 AM, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
> <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> wrote:
> 
>> Where is said draft? Hard to know if this would be time well spent if the
>> draft isn't available.
>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti-00 returns 404
>> 
>> Matthew Kaufman
>> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org
>> [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cullen Jennings (fluffy) 
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:08 AM To: <rtcweb@ietf.org> Subject:
>> [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti
>> 
>> 
>> I would like 25 minutes for presentation of information key to
>> draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti that is not interrupted and 15 minutes for
>> Q/A for the work.
>> 
>> We have spent many hours of meeting time discussing the way we were going
>> to make a decision around codecs and information needed, but we have not
>> yet spent time discussing the actually information to make the decision.
>> This draft addressees several very key issues, including the actually
>> quality comparison of VP8 and H.264. I think that spending any less time
>> than this would result in a situation where the WG was not making an
>> decisions with the information available. Similarly, other  people that
>> have written other drafts with similar or different views also need to
>> speak up about how much time they need and that we make sure everyone has
>> time to explain the key information, people have time to ask questions
>> about it, and we can make an informed decisions instead of having to
>> discuss the video codecs at many future meetings.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing list 
>> rtcweb@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing list 
> rtcweb@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
> 


- -- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=22m6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----