IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] resolutions in draft-cbran-rtcweb-codec-01

Ralph Giles <giles@thaumas.net> Tue, 29 November 2011 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <giles@thaumas.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB71F21F8B40 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:01:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hp+twahw2XXY for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:01:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vx0-f172.google.com (mail-vx0-f172.google.com [209.85.220.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541EE21F8B3F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:01:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vcbfy13 with SMTP id fy13so6796605vcb.31 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:01:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.68.232 with SMTP id z8mr13071673vdt.64.1322589707786; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:01:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.220.157.9 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:01:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [184.71.166.126]
In-Reply-To: <CAFA5A8A.57A9%cary.bran.standards@gmail.com>
References: <CAEW_Rkv1fo6VAtRvbTS8gwfs1FaHkfd=QXJg8Q+yLK+wg-dQsg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFA5A8A.57A9%cary.bran.standards@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:01:47 -0800
Message-ID: <CAEW_Rkt1DUXfXt9-bpa9M2PtR3V-g-hkdD7x2upyYR591HT=Pg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ralph Giles <giles@thaumas.net>
To: "Bran, Cary" <cary.bran.standards@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] resolutions in draft-cbran-rtcweb-codec-01
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:01:49 -0000

On 29 November 2011 09:57, Bran, Cary <cary.bran.standards@gmail.com> wrote:

>>I don't know how useful it is to have this as a SHOULD, but I would
>>ask why the corresponding PAL resolution (576 lines) isn't also
>>included if this one is considered useful.
>
> I have added this to the 02 version as a SHOULD.

Thanks!

> Stole a bit of this verbiage and integrated it into the 02 version.

Glad it was helpful, and thanks for fixing the duplicate 320x240.

 -r

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email