IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: discussion on fast notification work

Gábor Sándor Enyedi <gabor.sandor.enyedi@ericsson.com> Thu, 07 July 2011 12:06 UTC

Return-Path: <gabor.sandor.enyedi@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5F19E8004 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 05:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tTnq5fzyYtZ3 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 05:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C238721F85A7 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 05:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7bfdae000005125-ba-4e15a149d1c7
Received: from esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id A9.02.20773.941A51E4; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 14:06:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSCMS0359.eemea.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.227]) by esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.115.90]) with mapi; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 14:06:33 +0200
From: Gábor Sándor Enyedi <gabor.sandor.enyedi@ericsson.com>
To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, András Császár <Andras.Csaszar@ericsson.com>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 14:06:31 +0200
Subject: RE: discussion on fast notification work
Thread-Topic: discussion on fast notification work
Thread-Index: Acw8H0n6G1a4V8GGRZmQnro7jTwVSgAB7jCQABr4YLAAAU/skAAA8aNw
Message-ID: <EFAB865EBEFB734CA1FABD543B2E0E2E09FAF13C8C@ESESSCMS0359.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <CAG4d1rfNthpfrHDzPASL5UVgP8ixXCDQY4KZSerRqx9YUriOpA@mail.gmail.com> <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A0A8EEF877@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net> <8DCD771BDA4A394E9BCBA8932E8392973216EA6157@ESESSCMS0363.eemea.ericsson.se> <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A0A8EEFC2F@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
In-Reply-To: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A0A8EEFC2F@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
Accept-Language: hu-HU, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: hu-HU, en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:08:35 -0000

I may missed something, since I found only 1 mail you wrote to this list before in this year. Based on that mail, I think you are mixing things; there you were writing about draft-kini-ospf-fast-notification-01, while Andras is speaking about draft-csaszar-ipfrr-fn-00. While the first one is just wanting to increase the speed of LSA advertisement, the second one is doing real FRR using only data plane. Am I right, were you speaking about the former draft?
BR,

Gabor Enyedi

 

-----Original Message-----
From: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John E Drake
Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 1:23 PM
To: András Császár; Alia Atlas; rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: discussion on fast notification work

Please see my previous emails to the list.

Sent from my iPhone

> -----Original Message-----
> From: András Császár [mailto:Andras.Csaszar@ericsson.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:53 AM
> To: John E Drake; Alia Atlas; rtgwg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: discussion on fast notification work
> 
> Hi John,
> 
> Why exactly do you think it is "a really bad idea"?
> 
> Kind regards,
> András
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> > Behalf Of John E Drake
> > Sent: 2011. július 6. 23:54
> > To: Alia Atlas; rtgwg@ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: discussion on fast notification work
> >
> > Alia,
> >
> > Is it okay for me to say that I think that this is a really bad idea 
> > and that I was glad that interest in it had waned?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > John
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org
> > [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> > > Of Alia Atlas
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 1:57 PM
> > > To: rtgwg@ietf.org
> > > Subject: discussion on fast notification work
> > >
> > > The last 2 IETFs, we have had discussions about the idea of fast 
> > > notification, as described in 
> > > draft-lu-fast-notification-framework, draft-lu-fn-transport-00, 
> > > and draft-csaszar-ipfrr-fn-00.
> > >
> > > Since then, I have not seen substantial discussion or
> > interest on the
> > > mailing list.  If you are
> > > interested in this work, have questions about it, or would
> > like to see
> > > RTGWG continue to discuss it,
> > > please send email to this mailing list.  I'd like to see this 
> > > conversation happening here before IETF.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Alia
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rtgwg mailing list
> > > rtgwg@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtgwg mailing list
> > rtgwg@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
> >
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email