Re: discussion on fast notification work

[Anton Smirnov <[e-mail]>]

    Hi Gabor,
    I am not speaking of any particular draft, I am speaking of families 
of solutions - rerouting decision made entirely within router adjacent 
to failure vs. router close to failure point communicating with other 
routers to reroute traffic remotely.
    All FN drafts fall into category of remote notification; LFA, 
not-via and other works FN being compared with fall into category of 
local repair.

Anton


On 07/07/2011 02:06 PM, Gábor Sándor Enyedi wrote:
> I may missed something, since I found only 1 mail you wrote to this list before in this year. Based on that mail, I think you are mixing things; there you were writing about draft-kini-ospf-fast-notification-01, while Andras is speaking about draft-csaszar-ipfrr-fn-00. While the first one is just wanting to increase the speed of LSA advertisement, the second one is doing real FRR using only data plane. Am I right, were you speaking about the former draft?
> BR,
>
> Gabor Enyedi
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of John E Drake
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 1:23 PM
> To: András Császár; Alia Atlas; [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: discussion on fast notification work
>
> Please see my previous emails to the list.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: András Császár [mailto:[e-mail]]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 3:53 AM
>> To: John E Drake; Alia Atlas; [e-mail]
>> Subject: RE: discussion on fast notification work
>>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> Why exactly do you think it is "a really bad idea"?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> András
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
>>> Behalf Of John E Drake
>>> Sent: 2011. július 6. 23:54
>>> To: Alia Atlas; [e-mail]
>>> Subject: RE: discussion on fast notification work
>>>
>>> Alia,
>>>
>>> Is it okay for me to say that I think that this is a really bad idea
>>> and that I was glad that interest in it had waned?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [e-mail]
>>> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf
>>>> Of Alia Atlas
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 1:57 PM
>>>> To: [e-mail]
>>>> Subject: discussion on fast notification work
>>>>
>>>> The last 2 IETFs, we have had discussions about the idea of fast
>>>> notification, as described in
>>>> draft-lu-fast-notification-framework, draft-lu-fn-transport-00,
>>>> and draft-csaszar-ipfrr-fn-00.
>>>>
>>>> Since then, I have not seen substantial discussion or
>>> interest on the
>>>> mailing list.  If you are
>>>> interested in this work, have questions about it, or would
>>> like to see
>>>> RTGWG continue to discuss it,
>>>> please send email to this mailing list.  I'd like to see this
>>>> conversation happening here before IETF.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Alia
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rtgwg mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rtgwg mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg