discussion on fast notification work

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Wed, 06 July 2011 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E81A221F89B6 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XQeb0Yao-UKQ for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB0A21F89AE for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so391608pzk.31 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 13:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4BjGhbqDrLUqd/vQNuUCKOiFFKtfy+k1NnLS/y29t/A=; b=rdFRud1bdiiWNtG9t4l/ocfqe+O3nE6CoySTPFKcaCOvvaNtG0L/ezjF0yOVGMG1co 1SHSSm9A/GoRlrGobklJ2pMaTLJxs2BFCgrg9ghrAd5vH5YlCQmiLQRJNnsM2ekdBqDR 8yhabyHWnLwKjPO61WGKA5RtJUv0VhBznb17w=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.10.98 with SMTP id h2mr17912pbb.372.1309985832753; Wed, 06 Jul 2011 13:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.64.195 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jul 2011 13:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 16:57:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rfNthpfrHDzPASL5UVgP8ixXCDQY4KZSerRqx9YUriOpA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: discussion on fast notification work
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: rtgwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtgwg>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2011 20:57:14 -0000

The last 2 IETFs, we have had discussions about the idea of fast
notification, as described in
draft-lu-fast-notification-framework, draft-lu-fn-transport-00, and
draft-csaszar-ipfrr-fn-00.

Since then, I have not seen substantial discussion or interest on the
mailing list.  If you are
interested in this work, have questions about it, or would like to see
RTGWG continue to discuss it,
please send email to this mailing list.  I'd like to see this
conversation happening here before IETF.

Thanks,
Alia