RE: discussion on fast notification work

Hi John,

Why exactly do you think it is "a really bad idea"?

Kind regards,
András 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] 
> On Behalf Of John E Drake
> Sent: 2011. július 6. 23:54
> To: Alia Atlas; rtgwg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: discussion on fast notification work
> 
> Alia,
> 
> Is it okay for me to say that I think that this is a really 
> bad idea and that I was glad that interest in it had waned?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> John
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> > Of Alia Atlas
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 1:57 PM
> > To: rtgwg@ietf.org
> > Subject: discussion on fast notification work
> > 
> > The last 2 IETFs, we have had discussions about the idea of fast
> > notification, as described in
> > draft-lu-fast-notification-framework, draft-lu-fn-transport-00, and
> > draft-csaszar-ipfrr-fn-00.
> > 
> > Since then, I have not seen substantial discussion or 
> interest on the
> > mailing list.  If you are
> > interested in this work, have questions about it, or would 
> like to see
> > RTGWG continue to discuss it,
> > please send email to this mailing list.  I'd like to see this
> > conversation happening here before IETF.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Alia
> > _______________________________________________
> > rtgwg mailing list
> > rtgwg@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
> 