RE: discussion on fast notification work

Hi Alia/John,

Thanks for your comments.

We have been listening very carefully and have taken all the critic rather seriously.

We have changed the way we distribute FNs, added authentication and prototyped/measured convergence times in networks of different diameters.
We have also added some additional clients (protocols to use FN)

Updated draft will be published soon.

We would really like to present our work.

Thanks! 

Regards,
Jeff  

-----Original Message-----
From: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John E Drake
Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 14:54
To: Alia Atlas; rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: discussion on fast notification work

Alia,

Is it okay for me to say that I think that this is a really bad idea and that I was glad that interest in it had waned?

Thanks,

John

Sent from my iPhone

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtgwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Alia Atlas
> Sent: Wednesday, July 06, 2011 1:57 PM
> To: rtgwg@ietf.org
> Subject: discussion on fast notification work
> 
> The last 2 IETFs, we have had discussions about the idea of fast
> notification, as described in
> draft-lu-fast-notification-framework, draft-lu-fn-transport-00, and
> draft-csaszar-ipfrr-fn-00.
> 
> Since then, I have not seen substantial discussion or interest on the
> mailing list.  If you are
> interested in this work, have questions about it, or would like to see
> RTGWG continue to discuss it,
> please send email to this mailing list.  I'd like to see this
> conversation happening here before IETF.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alia
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg