IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02

Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com> Tue, 26 August 2014 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B339A1A0252 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.868
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.868 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JqK3p7gigm7T for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5021F1A01F1 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BIT46029; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:03:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DFWEML706-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.225) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:03:24 +0100
Received: from DFWEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.50]) by dfweml706-chm ([10.193.5.225]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:03:18 -0700
From: Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>, "Jim Guichard (jguichar)" <jguichar@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02
Thread-Index: AQHPwSKarKFwlbPq2EakRGFWvH7bz5vjk4KA//+qZfA=
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:03:17 +0000
Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D453DC968@dfweml701-chm>
References: <D021EA69.33AE5%jguichar@cisco.com> <CAA=duU2iCmFBDg8OS4mazS9QhYbcrxV4HCT5ayVToMUduLkX0A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU2iCmFBDg8OS4mazS9QhYbcrxV4HCT5ayVToMUduLkX0A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.132.114]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D453DC968dfweml701chm_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/D9Iblp_q2ODDxjwvhBb0P2SBuj4
Cc: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:03:48 -0000

Support the WG adoption and Andy’s point.
Lucy

From: sfc [mailto:sfc-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew G. Malis
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 12:07 PM
To: Jim Guichard (jguichar)
Cc: sfc@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02

Jim,

I support the adoption of this draft by the WG.

During the discussion of revision -01, although a number of WG participants requested a more flexible wording of the SFC encapsulation definition, it was unchanged from -01 to -02. This is within the rights of individual authors, of course. However, once this becomes a WG draft, I hope we can revisit that discussion.

Thanks,
Andy


On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Jim Guichard (jguichar) <jguichar@cisco.com<mailto:jguichar@cisco.com>> wrote:
Greetings WG:

This message begins a two week call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02 [http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-merged-sfc-architecture/] ending September 9th 2014.

Please respond to the SFC mailing list with any statements of approval or disapproval.

As always, please note:

  1.  This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is expected to modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the content is solid. Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see changes to its content.
  2.  If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
  3.  If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues and we can begin a dialog about how best to address them.

_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org<mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email