IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02

"UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com> Tue, 26 August 2014 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ju1738@att.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C52B1A014E for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.867
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.867 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RSf2NVpbEUNn for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:29:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com [209.65.160.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBE251A0125 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:29:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) with ESMTP id 622dcf35.2acd4585b940.1353940.00-2419.3788510.nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (envelope-from <ju1738@att.com>); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:29:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 53fcd2261b5416cc-63bfa66d6a37514b130f33f05fbf3ba123663fb9
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.2-0) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 522dcf35.0.1353920.00-2246.3788437.nbfkord-smmo07.seg.att.com (envelope-from <ju1738@att.com>); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:29:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 53fcd2265d8fe40e-1d08bafe03c600ca7b432a17c32d22b411b7f940
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7QITutS028378; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:29:57 -0400
Received: from mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.240]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7QITkJO028225 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:29:51 -0400
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUBAF.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUBAF.itservices.sbc.com [130.9.129.150]) by mlpi408.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:29:34 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSRCD.ITServices.sbc.com ([169.254.4.175]) by MISOUT7MSGHUBAF.ITServices.sbc.com ([130.9.129.150]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:29:33 -0400
From: "UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com>
To: 'Sumandra Majee' <S.Majee@F5.com>, "'Jim Guichard (jguichar)'" <jguichar@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02
Thread-Index: AQHPwSKarKFwlbPq2EakRGFWvH7bz5vjdv6A//++pxA=
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:29:33 +0000
Message-ID: <B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F06D7F152@MISOUT7MSGUSRCD.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <D021EA69.33AE5%jguichar@cisco.com> <3A9E5A05-79B1-41E1-875C-C466E496A711@F5.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A9E5A05-79B1-41E1-875C-C466E496A711@F5.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.70.205.11]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550F06D7F152MISOUT7MSGUSRCD_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=TNjyvSZa c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=t_MuBpRJa2UA:10 a=cn-s5AlbVPAA:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=mCL]
X-AnalysisOut: [VOu6BPzMA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=XIqpo32R]
X-AnalysisOut: [AAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=AUd_NHdVAAAA:8 a=LZ-rTN4J8hvhok-]
X-AnalysisOut: [qgrIA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=JfD0Fch1gWkA]
X-AnalysisOut: [:10 a=Kyuxm8M5sySPg0w8:21 a=LoX_apz9ZuftG_Se:21 a=yMhMjlub]
X-AnalysisOut: [AAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=rpC01cX5CnZlvGPCIuwA:9 a=gKO2Hq4]
X-AnalysisOut: [RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=frz4AuCg-hU]
X-AnalysisOut: [A:10 a=L2ZLBLpE17ivIH1R:21 a=CotGQkwG9g5jEk5X:21 a=0X0AQEZ]
X-AnalysisOut: [KTVdBYJUX:21]
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <ju1738@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/NFSNicdcGuRhmVYdefTUxS0Xsgo
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:54:42 -0700
Cc: "'sfc@ietf.org'" <sfc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:30:01 -0000

+1

From: sfc [mailto:sfc-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sumandra Majee
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 2:25 PM
To: Jim Guichard (jguichar)
Cc: sfc@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02

Support

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 26, 2014, at 4:41 AM, "Jim Guichard (jguichar)" <jguichar@cisco.com<mailto:jguichar@cisco.com>> wrote:
Greetings WG:

This message begins a two week call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02 [http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-merged-sfc-architecture/] ending September 9th 2014.

Please respond to the SFC mailing list with any statements of approval or disapproval.

As always, please note:

  1.  This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is expected to modify the document's content until there is WG consensus that the content is solid. Therefore, please don't oppose adoption just because you want to see changes to its content.
  2.  If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
  3.  If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues and we can begin a dialog about how best to address them.
_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org<mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email