IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02

"Guy Meador III (meadorg)" <meadorg@cisco.com> Wed, 27 August 2014 19:50 UTC

Return-Path: <meadorg@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A381A01A8 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.168
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.168 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nxq6CsFws56h for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91AA91A014E for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3794; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1409169051; x=1410378651; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=1y5K1B5L6IjL4ydHSX2nx5L9dC7PMNpuqefQhuryifo=; b=VKOheyb7LQ99N0hOxGaGJGtkGB1vGI56E66OEL3xAqZcxDdaKAm5k6d3 KDdw2dg1qHmfwKKZxpHvBs6q+h39hpaHwqw33uHPdaZ5FJ3j339v2Zppm sqK9b4x9uCOEe6Nbz4ozezh9ZeP7kIoej6j/eb68TWdrJBj5LywozhPb5 g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai4FAJM1/lOtJA2B/2dsb2JhbABbgkdGU1cEshyYI4FbAQmHTwGBEhZ3hAQBAQQBAQEaURsCAQgEDi0HJwsUAw4CBBOIQg2/SxePU4MvgR0FjxuCFIQthnyBW5M/g15sgUiBBwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,413,1406592000"; d="scan'208,217";a="350771203"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Aug 2014 19:50:50 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com [173.37.183.87]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7RJonwT003816 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 19:50:49 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.10]) by xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([173.37.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 14:50:49 -0500
From: "Guy Meador III (meadorg)" <meadorg@cisco.com>
To: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02
Thread-Index: AQHPwjAzrKFwlbPq2EakRGFWvH7bzw==
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 19:50:49 +0000
Message-ID: <A4D52CE0-956D-418B-BBAD-BBAF92805605@cisco.com>
References: <D021EA69.33AE5%jguichar@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D021EA69.33AE5%jguichar@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.117.94.199]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A4D52CE0956D418BBBADBBAF92805605ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/Okvs0Y2ecS0_zVetP59Xq0ADB8E
Subject: Re: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 19:50:55 -0000

Support.

On Aug 26, 2014, at 7:40 AM, Jim Guichard (jguichar) <jguichar@cisco.com<mailto:jguichar@cisco.com>> wrote:

Greetings WG:

This message begins a two week call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02 [http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-merged-sfc-architecture/] ending September 9th 2014.

Please respond to the SFC mailing list with any statements of approval or disapproval.

As always, please note:

  1.  This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is expected to modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the content is solid. Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see changes to its content.
  2.  If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
  3.  If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues and we can begin a dialog about how best to address them.

_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org<mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email