IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02

meng.wei2@zte.com.cn Wed, 27 August 2014 01:04 UTC

Return-Path: <meng.wei2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D6991A02EB; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.867
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.867 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xa5HMPy-wPSK; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx6.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [95.130.199.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273F71A02D2; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:04:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.168.119]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTP id AEE00193F7B9; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:04:35 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse01.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.3.20]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 78F015F729D; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:04:33 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id s7R14YFu025359; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:04:34 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from meng.wei2@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <D021EA69.33AE5%jguichar@cisco.com>
To: "Jim Guichard (jguichar)" <jguichar@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.4 March 27, 2005
Message-ID: <OFE30DE458.2D0DF9F0-ON48257D41.0005BECB-48257D41.0005FB4F@zte.com.cn>
From: meng.wei2@zte.com.cn
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 09:04:33 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.3FP6|November 21, 2013) at 2014-08-27 09:04:14, Serialize complete at 2014-08-27 09:04:14
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0005FB4F48257D41_="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn s7R14YFu025359
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/Ru99djwfXPqZUTzPsUVa5FF10gU
Cc: sfc <sfc-bounces@ietf.org>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 01:04:48 -0000

Support +1

"sfc" <sfc-bounces@ietf.org>  2014/08/26 19:40:58:

> Greetings WG:
> 
> This message begins a two week call for WG adoption of draft-merged-
> sfc-architecture-02 [http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-merged-
> sfc-architecture/] ending September 9th 2014.
> 
> Please respond to the SFC mailing list with any statements of 
> approval or disapproval.
> 
> As always, please note:
> 1. This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG 
> is expected to modify the document’s content until there is WG 
> consensus that the content is solid. Therefore, please don’t oppose 
> adoption just because you want to see changes to its content.
> 2. If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state 
> your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your 
concerns.
> 3. If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those 
> issues and we can begin a dialog about how best to address them.
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email