IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02

Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com> Wed, 27 August 2014 02:18 UTC

Return-Path: <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6481A0363 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:18:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.868
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.868 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id niyWFXE1XUla for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 459711A0360 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BIT64890; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 02:17:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.37) by lhreml405-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.242) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:17:55 +0100
Received: from NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.8.204]) by nkgeml406-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.37]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:17:49 +0800
From: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>, "Jim Guichard (jguichar)" <jguichar@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02
Thread-Index: AQHPwSKarKFwlbPq2EakRGFWvH7bz5vimA2AgAEflhA=
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 02:17:49 +0000
Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE082AB308@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <D021EA69.33AE5%jguichar@cisco.com> <CAA=duU2iCmFBDg8OS4mazS9QhYbcrxV4HCT5ayVToMUduLkX0A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU2iCmFBDg8OS4mazS9QhYbcrxV4HCT5ayVToMUduLkX0A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.98.134]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE082AB308NKGEML512MBSchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/J1p9lGJx7_CDV5VrB0ef0Wzgm4g
Cc: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 02:18:00 -0000

Support the adoption and agree with Andy’s point.

Xiaohu

From: sfc [mailto:sfc-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew G. Malis
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 1:07 AM
To: Jim Guichard (jguichar)
Cc: sfc@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02

Jim,

I support the adoption of this draft by the WG.

During the discussion of revision -01, although a number of WG participants requested a more flexible wording of the SFC encapsulation definition, it was unchanged from -01 to -02. This is within the rights of individual authors, of course. However, once this becomes a WG draft, I hope we can revisit that discussion.

Thanks,
Andy


On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Jim Guichard (jguichar) <jguichar@cisco.com<mailto:jguichar@cisco.com>> wrote:
Greetings WG:

This message begins a two week call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02 [http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-merged-sfc-architecture/] ending September 9th 2014.

Please respond to the SFC mailing list with any statements of approval or disapproval.

As always, please note:

  1.  This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is expected to modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the content is solid. Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see changes to its content.
  2.  If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
  3.  If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues and we can begin a dialog about how best to address them.

_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org<mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email