IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02

Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net> Wed, 27 August 2014 01:21 UTC

Return-Path: <bensons@queuefull.net>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C831A02EB for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nyXLqGlJ3Yoy for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yh0-f42.google.com (mail-yh0-f42.google.com [209.85.213.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 026841A02D2 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yh0-f42.google.com with SMTP id a41so12927249yho.29 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=nQXQYNoU0oMtZMkHD18KEpeSqR+e5gVlwzawUnAHFLE=; b=dcCRbUXK3zHtxdCjSNJmk/IaHUeBNTIaxgNXJB6ZalcSsQFCtLMk7MGNdHdiZuuwUN e6acrNjjz5cYzWyOmIaLEIBy/BF+KLCYXArqxyyg/Z4biHznhbGpFHpXuOh1lWvux2Rx ICDbIyMLWzwvH8dF3Vry9K2vYd2pYfqgK9VZUPk5Z9UokQ3LISC/xakUMHaJKksw3lxu xDpUi1LGFixOSUDSM3gbdJOQFSZUnf/+q2l1x6aimxr3htVH42LlbI9PHEZoCagJoAVU JOrH2zS6+k1NiQfxOMio8CRdv5k27IOG6/PzefSeSO68PDIBTr14DyyGQO0kx/4y1ER6 3dkg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm2qUtdMw54fmgydMSrWVWreLDPSiJzBr4w1kTPif1XhNN9eJTcuePLXndQlbplcMjDJi7c
X-Received: by 10.236.27.105 with SMTP id d69mr49111948yha.72.1409102490216; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2602:100:4473:9afe:e4fc:f65a:71c6:a155? ([2602:100:4473:9afe:e4fc:f65a:71c6:a155]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e97sm2765707yhq.48.2014.08.26.18.21.29 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0ED41693-B6F5-464B-AC89-941A3C3B0E25"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>
In-Reply-To: <D021EA69.33AE5%jguichar@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 21:21:28 -0400
Message-Id: <CE60FEE8-8198-4E2F-93CE-F963E3E20602@queuefull.net>
References: <D021EA69.33AE5%jguichar@cisco.com>
To: "Jim Guichard (jguichar)" <jguichar@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/jp5nHJa73hAC6U1zmnsRi4Wx7K8
Cc: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 01:21:33 -0000

I support adoption of this draft.
-Benson


On Aug 26, 2014, at 7:40 AM, Jim Guichard (jguichar) <jguichar@cisco.com> wrote:

> Greetings WG:
> 
> This message begins a two week call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02 [http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-merged-sfc-architecture/] ending September 9th 2014.
> 
> Please respond to the SFC mailing list with any statements of approval or disapproval.
> 
> As always, please note:
> This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is expected to modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the content is solid. Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see changes to its content.
> If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
> If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues and we can begin a dialog about how best to address them.
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email