Re: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02

Barry Greene <bgreene@senki.org> Thu, 28 August 2014 00:49 UTC

Return-Path: <bgreene@senki.org>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390031A036B for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sgfazuLKCSxu for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp89.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp89.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80AFC1A02BC for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp20.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7BCDC180252; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 20:49:37 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp20.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: bgreene-AT-senki.org) with ESMTPSA id BF510180257; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 20:49:35 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: bgreene@senki.org
Received: from [10.0.1.14] ([UNAVAILABLE]. [139.228.10.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:587 (trex/5.2.10); Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:49:37 GMT
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_31F0100E-A1FA-4FA7-A261-FA1C80E8AEE6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Barry Greene <bgreene@senki.org>
In-Reply-To: <D021EA69.33AE5%jguichar@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 07:49:23 +0700
Message-Id: <8F451428-8508-40B9-B610-541556B3BAA7@senki.org>
References: <D021EA69.33AE5%jguichar@cisco.com>
To: Jim Guichard <jguichar@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/sboNFGDJOMfyUTjr-c0ECgX3QUE
Cc: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:49:40 -0000

+1 Support

On Aug 26, 2014, at 6:40 PM, Jim Guichard (jguichar) <jguichar@cisco.com> wrote:

> Greetings WG:
> 
> This message begins a two week call for WG adoption of draft-merged-sfc-architecture-02 [http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-merged-sfc-architecture/] ending September 9th 2014.
> 
> Please respond to the SFC mailing list with any statements of approval or disapproval.
> 
> As always, please note:
> This is not WG Last Call. The document is not final, and the WG is expected to modify the document’s content until there is WG consensus that the content is solid. Therefore, please don’t oppose adoption just because you want to see changes to its content.
> If you have objections to adoption of the document, please state your reasons why, and explain what it would take to address your concerns.
> If you have issues with the content, by all means raise those issues and we can begin a dialog about how best to address them.
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc