IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Sat, 27 October 2018 19:30 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C91123FFD; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 12:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HoyLYbMug9H4; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 12:30:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3184130D7A; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 12:30:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9198; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1540668615; x=1541878215; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=TRQy6oF2oLPyk7QWIp9KgXDdYhtnqPfvBXQvbeyN870=; b=ZlKZFMMxfq6bmfs9i+lo4KUrlBziiFuP6Zhq/9H4oIn1HNI0i/fbBz7P ExA1wuR2LLH+3Yuz8WALDYusojpTTLkCT5vT2bNq2nC5CAgVw7hQI3CQr YcHaWIu+7pYOdXdBSUc+c3vP1CqCRtNkZZiZcI2uRyGyP6iF1eqq0RDS7 w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AFAACpu9Rb/5hdJa1jGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGBDXdmfygKg2uIGIwXgWglkVWFS4F6CwEBGAEKg0iBAQIXgwEhNA0NAQMBAQIBAQJtHAyFOwIEAQEbBksLEAIBCA4tBAMCAgIlCxQRAgQOBYMhAYEdZA+nB4EuhCwBEUCFEwWLZxeBQT+BEScME4JMgxsBAQMBgVyDBTGCJgKOSoYiih0JAoZoihoYgVKEd4l+jHCHMYJUAhEUgSYdOIFVcBU7KgGCQT6CEYhKhT0Bb4s+gR8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,433,1534809600"; d="scan'208,217";a="191946732"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Oct 2018 19:30:13 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-016.cisco.com (xch-rtp-016.cisco.com [64.101.220.156]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9RJU7Yq028184 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 27 Oct 2018 19:30:13 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-016.cisco.com (64.101.220.156) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 15:30:09 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 15:30:08 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Med Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
CC: "sfc-chairs@ietf.org" <sfc-chairs@ietf.org>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Thread-Index: AQHUbit4x0N6riJfPESm9SddYoTwyQ==
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 19:30:08 +0000
Message-ID: <AF259B5F-84BC-4A2A-8475-4816F4041EBF@cisco.com>
References: <153903723495.18337.3050104581221499764.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DFF499B@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DFF499B@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.39)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.105.114]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AF259B5F84BC4A2A84754816F4041EBFciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.156, xch-rtp-016.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/Wy-1t8iNUxgSU2yqT38622Yb7LM>
Subject: Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 19:30:19 -0000

Med,

A similar disclosure is needed IMHO to this draft; will try to get this done soon.

Are you having this disclosure submitted as you had indicated?

Joel, Jim,

Would that impact the adoption call?

Thanks,

Carlos.


On Oct 17, 2018, at 4:28 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:

Hi all,

FWIW, I'm aware of an IPR that might be applicable to this I-D. That IPR was already disclosed for the OAM framework I-D: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3121/

A similar disclosure is needed IMHO to this draft; will try to get this done soon.

Cheers,
Med

-----Message d'origine-----
De : sfc [mailto:sfc-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de IETF Secretariat
Envoyé : mardi 9 octobre 2018 00:21
À : draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam@ietf.org<mailto:draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam@ietf.org>; sfc-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:sfc-chairs@ietf.org>;
sfc@ietf.org<mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
Objet : [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam in state
"Candidate for WG Adoption"


The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam in state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Joel Halpern)

The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam/

Comment:
This document has been presented at several SFC working group sessions.  The
authors have asked for Working Group Adoption.  This starts a two week call
for that adoption.  Please speak up, preferably with supporting explanations,
in favor of or opposed to the working group adopting this document. The last
call will end CoB  somewhere 22-October-2018 (e.g. by the time I do anything
about it, it will be at least the 23rd everywhere.)

Thank you,
Joel and Jim

_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc

_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org<mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email