Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Sat, 27 October 2018 21:20 UTC
Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E467128A6E; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 14:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YYD8S0MrfEmh; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 14:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C76551277D2; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 14:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B395A1C0384; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 14:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1540675200; bh=Ko53mEVGlrkHv6nNJVD1632PDS/OHvwidL0L4+a6DHY=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=XAuDKyX+Cw2LML3OPOl6JvF3HhZkw3tF2VIbu/EUtEUtodJ5Oel0mdqfGXywc9nRF zIq4C81l6vHMsxRJgJyfXj5/hNZ3MCT1ThNR7fo4AnaEaEXBkZpTvj8ZMkcom9VmUE bZbsPxp0L48L3dEOjHXxQPn0PYOqSs++9Nk7xFBI=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1469E4A537D; Sat, 27 Oct 2018 14:20:00 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, Med Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Cc: "sfc-chairs@ietf.org" <sfc-chairs@ietf.org>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
References: <153903723495.18337.3050104581221499764.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DFF499B@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <AF259B5F-84BC-4A2A-8475-4816F4041EBF@cisco.com>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <6fbbcc7d-1400-7e1d-b819-60aa1c936d99@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 17:19:59 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AF259B5F-84BC-4A2A-8475-4816F4041EBF@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/vzO-Vw1EtDnNPg9ihT79IWEwWog>
Subject: Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 21:20:02 -0000
The disclosure was made to the working group. No one raised an issue about it. The requirement is that they be disclosed. Which he did. Yours, Joel On 10/27/18 3:30 PM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote: > Med, > >> A similar disclosure is needed IMHO to this draft; will try to get >> this done soon. > > Are you having this disclosure submitted as you had indicated? > > Joel, Jim, > > Would that impact the adoption call? > > Thanks, > > Carlos. > > >> On Oct 17, 2018, at 4:28 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com >> <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> FWIW, I'm aware of an IPR that might be applicable to this I-D. That >> IPR was already disclosed for the OAM framework I-D: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/3121/ >> >> A similar disclosure is needed IMHO to this draft; will try to get >> this done soon. >> >> Cheers, >> Med >> >>> -----Message d'origine----- >>> De : sfc [mailto:sfc-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de IETF Secretariat >>> Envoyé : mardi 9 octobre 2018 00:21 >>> À : draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam@ietf.org >>> <mailto:draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam@ietf.org>; sfc-chairs@ietf.org >>> <mailto:sfc-chairs@ietf.org>; >>> sfc@ietf.org <mailto:sfc@ietf.org> >>> Objet : [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam in >>> state >>> "Candidate for WG Adoption" >>> >>> >>> The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam in state >>> Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Joel Halpern) >>> >>> The document is available at >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam/ >>> >>> Comment: >>> This document has been presented at several SFC working group >>> sessions. The >>> authors have asked for Working Group Adoption. This starts a two >>> week call >>> for that adoption. Please speak up, preferably with supporting >>> explanations, >>> in favor of or opposed to the working group adopting this document. >>> The last >>> call will end CoB somewhere 22-October-2018 (e.g. by the time I do >>> anything >>> about it, it will be at least the 23rd everywhere.) >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Joel and Jim >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sfc mailing list >>> sfc@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sfc mailing list >> sfc@ietf.org <mailto:sfc@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc >
- [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-… IETF Secretariat
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… xiao.min2
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… Linda Wang
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… ao.ting
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… meng.wei2
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… John E Drake
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… wangyuwei@ict.ac.cn
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… xiao.min2
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… Carlos Pignataro
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… xiao.min2
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placeddraft-wang-sfc-mul… xiao.min2
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-mu… mohamed.boucadair