Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam instate"Candidate for WG Adoption"

<xiao.min2@zte.com.cn> Fri, 26 October 2018 08:01 UTC

Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C732912D7EA; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 01:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r2ngFjaS2-K8; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 01:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 595CA12F18C; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 01:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse01.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.3.20]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id E902CF0418FF7941EB50; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 16:01:49 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp02.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.201]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with SMTP id w9Q81fNd055823; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 16:01:41 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp03[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 16:01:42 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 16:01:42 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afb5bd2c9e655508b56
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <201810261601427799745@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <D0756B6B-8FA2-4D8E-9F2C-2FF0A6FBF9D9@cisco.com>
References: 153903723495.18337.3050104581221499764.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com, D0756B6B-8FA2-4D8E-9F2C-2FF0A6FBF9D9@cisco.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: cpignata@cisco.com
Cc: sfc-chairs@ietf.org, draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam@ietf.org, sfc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn w9Q81fNd055823
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/g_hRTM0iEwNL5J2zVUCDXq3fuuI>
Subject: Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam instate"Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 08:01:56 -0000

Hi Carlos,






I read the clear comment from the chairs Joel and Jim, especially the following words.


-----------------------------------------------------------   snip   -------------------------------------------------------------


This starts a two week call for that adoption.  Please speak up, preferably with supporting explanations,in favor of or opposed to the working group adopting this document.


-----------------------------------------------------------   snap   ------------------------------------------------------------


As to the already adopted draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework, if I understand it correctly, this draft is informational and it doesn't raise any practical solution of SFC OAM, so I believe the alignment between draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework and draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam can be done and should be done after the adoption poll conclude.






Best Regards,


Xiao Min







原始邮件



发件人:CarlosPignataro(cpignata) <cpignata@cisco.com>
收件人:肖敏10093570;
抄送人:sfc-chairs@ietf.org <sfc-chairs@ietf.org>;draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam@ietf.org <draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam@ietf.org>;sfc@ietf.org <sfc@ietf.org>;
日 期 :2018年10月26日 11:35
主 题 :Re: [sfc]  The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam instate"Candidate for WG Adoption"


Is this an active adoption poll issued by the chairs? Candidate indicates potential or intent, not action, so far as I know. 
As this is being discussed, does this draft conform with the SFC WG adopted OAM framework draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework?

 


Thanks,
 
— Carlos Pignataro


 
On Oct 10, 2018, at 1:52 AM, xiao.min2@zte.com.cn wrote:
 


Hi SFC Chairs et al,


 


I support WG adotion of this draft, because this work of active OAM is within our charter and complementary with already adopted iOAM. 


 


Best Regards,


Xiao Min


 


_______________________________________________ sfc mailing list sfc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc 

 






发件人:IETFSecretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>

收件人:draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam@ietf.org <draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam@ietf.org>sfc-chairs@ietf.org  <sfc-chairs@ietf.org>sfc@ietf.org <sfc@ietf.org>

日 期 :2018年10月09日 06:20

主 题 :[sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam in state"Candidate for WG Adoption"



 The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam in state Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Joel Halpern) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam/ Comment: This document has been presented at several SFC working group sessions.  The authors have asked for Working Group Adoption.  This starts a two week call for that adoption.  Please speak up, preferably with supporting explanations, in favor of or opposed to the working group adopting this document. The last call will end CoB  somewhere 22-October-2018 (e.g. by the time I do anything about it, it will be at least the 23rd everywhere.) Thank you, Joel and Jim _______________________________________________ sfc mailing list sfc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc