Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam in state"Candidate for WG Adoption"

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Fri, 26 October 2018 03:35 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA41412DD85; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 20:35:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.97
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.97 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.47, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1NPPUM_krH9v; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 20:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B44D130DC9; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 20:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=12490; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1540524898; x=1541734498; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=k/g8ZyS8h9dPIw4OWMwCFWdc73GYiw3VsdN8EWycewc=; b=BTSG7AQZEFKPlzmEVD1aE2Cv9Y7Sgxv52iyFWRWCMTGbJcHxPZjyuYMD zOlSyPdrfmA7kqPhFaHOuhjur0CC4ATWvotWxIHuDbu5SnNUYBIGd/0Kh LxSQGAZ5XU3vHqwKWLO1mVO4bbY9RJ+i20PhyJnRvp9mYndCcc1ZsQg0j E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ANAAD2itJb/5BdJa1jGwEBAQEDAQEBBwMBAQGBUQYBAQELAYENd2Z/KAqDa4gYjBeTX4VKgXoLAQEYAQqESQIXgnohNA0NAQMBAQIBAQJtHAELhTsCAQMBARsGSwsQAgEGAjsEAwICAiULFBECBA4FgyEBgR1kD4wEm02BLoQ+QIUZBYtmF4FBP4E4H4JMgxsBAQMBgVyDBDGCJgKORJAyCQKGZooVGIFShHaJe4xqhyWCUwIRFIEmHTiBVXAVOyoBgkE+ghGISoU9AW+MD4EfAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,426,1534809600"; d="scan'208,217";a="474967594"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Oct 2018 03:34:44 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com (xch-rtp-017.cisco.com [64.101.220.157]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w9Q3YiGA030474 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 26 Oct 2018 03:34:44 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com (64.101.220.157) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 23:34:43 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 23:34:43 -0400
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: "xiao.min2@zte.com.cn" <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
CC: "sfc-chairs@ietf.org" <sfc-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam@ietf.org" <draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam@ietf.org>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam in state"Candidate for WG Adoption"
Thread-Index: AQHUYF2IoU7w80JNV0SZcs6PT31DD6UxO/2A
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 03:34:43 +0000
Message-ID: <D0756B6B-8FA2-4D8E-9F2C-2FF0A6FBF9D9@cisco.com>
References: <153903723495.18337.3050104581221499764.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <201810101352430180571@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <201810101352430180571@zte.com.cn>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.100.39)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.116.132]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D0756B6B8FA24D8E9F2C2FF0A6FBF9D9ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.157, xch-rtp-017.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/hEyYR9l19P0a-ROwIJUx6CYSo9c>
Subject: Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam in state"Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 03:35:01 -0000

Is this an active adoption poll issued by the chairs? Candidate indicates potential or intent, not action, so far as I know.

As this is being discussed, does this draft conform with the SFC WG adopted OAM framework draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework?

Thanks,

— Carlos Pignataro

On Oct 10, 2018, at 1:52 AM, xiao.min2@zte.com.cn<mailto:xiao.min2@zte.com.cn> wrote:


Hi SFC Chairs et al,


I support WG adotion of this draft, because this work of active OAM is within our charter and complementary with already adopted iOAM.


Best Regards,

Xiao Min

原始邮件
发件人:IETFSecretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>>
收件人:draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam@ietf.org<mailto:draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam@ietf.org> <draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam@ietf.org<mailto:draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam@ietf.org>>sfc-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:sfc-chairs@ietf.org> <sfc-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:sfc-chairs@ietf.org>>sfc@ietf.org<mailto:sfc@ietf.org> <sfc@ietf.org<mailto:sfc@ietf.org>>
日 期 :2018年10月09日 06:20
主 题 :[sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam in state"Candidate for WG Adoption"

The SFC WG has placed draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam in state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Joel Halpern)

The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-sfc-multi-layer-oam/

Comment:
This document has been presented at several SFC working group sessions.  The
authors have asked for Working Group Adoption.  This starts a two week call
for that adoption.  Please speak up, preferably with supporting explanations,
in favor of or opposed to the working group adopting this document. The last
call will end CoB  somewhere 22-October-2018 (e.g. by the time I do anything
about it, it will be at least the 23rd everywhere.)

Thank you,
Joel and Jim

_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org<mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc


_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org<mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc