Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in the SFC WG
Zhen Cao <zehn.cao@gmail.com> Sun, 30 March 2014 08:24 UTC
Return-Path: <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462D81A0785 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 01:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gIv-Ps-NF74L for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 01:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x235.google.com (mail-qc0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535631A0479 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 01:24:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id e9so7613458qcy.40 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 01:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bo7U9yP0d5dzaKh++f0kNO81+/eof/qKcoWERe25lL8=; b=KapxXCD0JW+bqJ9MTU+605ZGJF7hWfHNhpWCp7NT/P+91hHsCh/YIEzDnvDQSPp+QK QPtGTrjuKXn0pWan0sYyuSwkedICVLVgvE08a2g4iwaciQxgu2+wqOSpORqBUvzOxKjg 9sPQUP/cYo/UczLA7AVMJvEnwHLxI6dZ+3ytwgUVra8LNEO38zEbZ+Dt6XCjA/Wkbf93 0AmV8KASKrifLoI3mfsc+mxhBHgVSdLJ6ukWoDZmYrvwaTqCUMDO4Bnsy/MsOdmAh7WP ZShgTP9rtaL9z3qWZ1dUh20en1O3vgLl7KMmr0H73rFhkB2i131uP2lsqNc1wPR851fQ n6Qw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.229.58.68 with SMTP id f4mr760618qch.18.1396167858396; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 01:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.96.111.169 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Mar 2014 01:24:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CF5B2896.1E7AC%jguichar@cisco.com>
References: <CF588C77.1E5F9%jguichar@cisco.com> <CAProHARwm+vZC0YboprVMM94BCrdKXOR7m0GUA5KTxu08hKJ0w@mail.gmail.com> <53358F53.2030409@joelhalpern.com> <CF5B2896.1E7AC%jguichar@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 16:24:18 +0800
Message-ID: <CAProHATB=2jLXaQ8Yg+ZPg0w0dvL9XA3DP_QURZp8e5TZhimHw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zhen Cao <zehn.cao@gmail.com>
To: "Jim Guichard (jguichar)" <jguichar@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/bXa8lC556BcYng3LstH732ak_Ks
Cc: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in the SFC WG
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 08:24:23 -0000
Hi Jim I do not think ease to liaison is a good reason. Does IETF produce documents based on the ease to liaison? And one document is even easier :) Many thanks, zhen On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 1:25 AM, Jim Guichard (jguichar) <jguichar@cisco.com> wrote: > Thank you Joel. Yes, this is the approach we plan to take and I see a lot > of support for that on the list. > > On 3/28/14, 11:03 AM, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote: > >>One aspect in the chairs proposal that struck me has particularly useful >>was keeping the use case document for specific partners separate. That >>way, it is MUCH easier to liaise with 3GPP or the BBF on the aspects of >>the use cases that are important to them. >> >>Yours, >>Joel >> >>On 3/28/14, 4:34 AM, Zhen Cao wrote: >>> Dear Chairs, >>> >>> I do not know how we come to this conclusion given the below facts >>> 1) Email discussion on January, >>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sfc/current/msg00966.html, with >>> many supports of moving forward the document draft-liu-sfc-use-cases. >>> >>> 2) London discussion as per >>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/minutes/minutes-89-sfc , where >>> several people voice out that we need one document >>> >>> As for draft-liu-sfc-use-cases, I'd say it is not a simple 'general' >>> use cases write-up, actually it has already merged with one mobility >>> use case from Med, and it also describe the use cases from the >>> abstract point of view, i.e. two angles that try to summarize the >>> existing activities. >>> >>> Technically, one use cases document is much better for people both >>> inside and outside to understand the sfc activities better. The >>> draft-liu-sfc-use-cases serves this target very well. And many use >>> cases are basically the same according the chaining logic, why we need >>> so many... >>> >>> So based on previous discussion both on the list and f2f meeting, I >>> am suggesting that we move forward the general document and consider >>> other documents in meanwhile as they turn out to be significant. >>> >>> Many thanks, >>> zhen cao >>> china mobile >>> >>>> That leaves: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-sfc-use-cases/, >>>>a >>>> more general document. But that document includes text on three topics >>>>that >>>> would be covered in more detail elsewhere (broadband, mobile, and DC). >>>>While >>>> this document could contain pointers to the other documents, that >>>>leaves the >>>> document with very little standalone content -- raising the question >>>>of what >>>> should be done with it, or what content it could incorporate in order >>>>to be >>>> worthwhile as a standalone document. >>>> >>>> Thus, the chairs recommendation at this time is: >>>> >>>> 1) Call for WG adoption of draft-haeffner-sfc-use-case-mobility-00.txt >>>>and >>>> draft-kumar-sfc-dc-use-cases-00.txt as WG documents (target: >>>>informational). >>>> >>>> 2) Defer action on draft-liu-service-chaining-use-cases and >>>> draft-meng-sfc-broadband-usecases per the above discussion. >>>> >>>> Does this make sense? >>>> >>>> Jim & Thomas >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sfc mailing list >>>> sfc@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sfc mailing list >>> sfc@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc >>> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>sfc mailing list >>sfc@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc >
- [sfc] Progression of use case documents in the SF… Jim Guichard (jguichar)
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Ken Gray (kegray)
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Jerome Moisand
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Paul Quinn (paulq)
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Liushucheng (Will)
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Zhen Cao
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… meng.wei2
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… meng.wei2
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Jerome Moisand
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Jim Guichard (jguichar)
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Surendra Kumar (smkumar)
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Jeffrey Napper (jenapper)
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Jiangyuanlong
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Hongyu Li (Julio)
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Jiangyuanlong
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Hongyu Li (Julio)
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Jiangyuanlong
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Jim Guichard (jguichar)
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Diego R. Lopez
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Zhen Cao
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Zhen Cao
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… xiechf01
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Qiong
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Jiangyuanlong
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… mohamed.boucadair
- [sfc] 答复: Re: Progression of use case documents i… wang.cui1
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Jerome Moisand
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Haeffner, Walter, Vodafone DE
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Haeffner, Walter, Vodafone DE
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Lucy yong
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Zhen Cao
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Zhen Cao
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Hui Deng
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Jiangyuanlong
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Jim Guichard (jguichar)
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Jim Guichard (jguichar)
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Zhen Cao
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in th… mohamed.boucadair