Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in the SFC WG

[Zhen Cao <[e-mail]>]

+ 1

and expecting an answer...

On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Lucy yong <[e-mail]> wrote:
> +1.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sfc [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of [e-mail]
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 1:42 AM
> To: Jim Guichard (jguichar); Joel M. Halpern; Zhen Cao
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in the SFC WG
>
> How can you judge the support of your suggested position at this stage? What does mean "a lot of support" here?!.
>
> As a chair you should not bias the discussion.
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
>>-----Message d'origine-----
>>De : sfc [mailto:[e-mail]] De la part de Jim Guichard
>>(jguichar)
>>Envoyé : vendredi 28 mars 2014 18:25
>>À : Joel M. Halpern; Zhen Cao
>>Cc : [e-mail]
>>Objet : Re: [sfc] Progression of use case documents in the SFC WG
>>
>>Thank you Joel. Yes, this is the approach we plan to take and I see a
>>lot of support for that on the list.
>>
>>On 3/28/14, 11:03 AM, "Joel M. Halpern" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>>One aspect in the chairs proposal that struck me has particularly
>>>useful was keeping the use case document for specific partners
>>>separate.  That way, it is MUCH easier to liaise with 3GPP or the BBF
>>>on the aspects of the use cases that are important to them.
>>>
>>>Yours,
>>>Joel
>>>
>>>On 3/28/14, 4:34 AM, Zhen Cao wrote:
>>>> Dear Chairs,
>>>>
>>>> I do not know how we come to this conclusion given the below facts
>>>> 1) Email discussion on January,
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sfc/current/msg00966.html, with
>>>> many supports of moving forward the  document draft-liu-sfc-use-cases.
>>>>
>>>> 2) London discussion as per
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/minutes/minutes-89-sfc , where
>>>> several people voice out that we need one document
>>>>
>>>> As for draft-liu-sfc-use-cases, I'd say it is not a simple 'general'
>>>> use cases write-up, actually it has already merged with one mobility
>>>> use case from Med, and it also describe the use cases from the
>>>> abstract point of view, i.e. two angles that try to summarize the
>>>> existing activities.
>>>>
>>>> Technically, one use cases document is much better for people both
>>>> inside and outside to understand the sfc activities better. The
>>>> draft-liu-sfc-use-cases serves this target very well. And many use
>>>> cases are basically the same according the chaining logic, why we
>>>> need so many...
>>>>
>>>> So based on previous discussion both on the list and f2f meeting,  I
>>>> am suggesting that we move forward the general document and consider
>>>> other documents in meanwhile as they turn out to be significant.
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks,
>>>> zhen cao
>>>> china mobile
>>>>
>>>>> That leaves:
>>>>>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liu-sfc-use-cases/,
>>>>>a
>>>>> more general document. But that document includes text on three
>>>>>topics that  would be covered in more detail elsewhere (broadband,
>>>>>mobile, and DC).
>>>>>While
>>>>> this document could contain pointers to the other documents, that
>>>>>leaves the  document with very little standalone content -- raising
>>>>>the question of what  should be done with it, or what content it
>>>>>could incorporate in order to be  worthwhile as a standalone
>>>>>document.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thus, the chairs recommendation at this time is:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Call for WG adoption of
>>>>>draft-haeffner-sfc-use-case-mobility-00.txt
>>>>>and
>>>>> draft-kumar-sfc-dc-use-cases-00.txt as WG documents (target:
>>>>>informational).
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) Defer action on draft-liu-service-chaining-use-cases  and
>>>>> draft-meng-sfc-broadband-usecases per the above discussion.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this make sense?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jim & Thomas
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> sfc mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> sfc mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
>>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>sfc mailing list
>>>[e-mail]
>>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>sfc mailing list
>>[e-mail]
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
>
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc