Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz

[Chris Morrow <[e-mail]>]

At Sat, 3 Sep 2016 14:06:25 -0700,
joel jaeggli <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> [1 Re: Current document status && directionz <multipart/mixed (7bit)>]
> [1.1  <text/plain; windows-1252 (quoted-printable)>]
> On 9/2/16 1:56 PM, Chris Morrow wrote:
> > 
> > Howdy SIDR peeps,
> > (+bonus ops ad)
> > 
> > Following on the Berlin meeting we were trying to accomplish two
> > things:
> > 
> >   1) get all documents related to sidr protocols into wglc and then
> >   publication
> > 
> >   2) get all documents which are more operationally focused moved
> >   along to an ops group (sidr-ops or something akin to that)
> > 
> > With that in mind there are 8 documents in the publication queue:
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis
> > 
> > and 11 still in progress. Of the 11 left Sandy and I think they
> > roughly break down like:
> > 
> > Documents which should move to the ops group:
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-rollover
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light - authors notified/queried about this
> >   draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying
> 
> I think we good good feeback on the draft of a charter, I will start
> work on taking this to the IESG, but as some point soon the time will
> come to ask for community review of that proposal.
> 

I also forgot to mention the all-res draft: 
  draft-rir-rpki-allres-ta-app-statement

is waiting for some AD comments to complete (with chairs I mean) to set location/direction.