Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz

Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> Thu, 08 September 2016 21:01 UTC

Return-Path: <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFC812B258 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.409
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.409 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cmcICZbDtJ4V for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1673E12B0CA for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6911728B003B for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 17:01:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618D01F8036; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 17:01:51 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_61F2AA03-5E36-42AD-92B2-060DD16B14B0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <etPan.57d1a436.41d16d8a.1a2d@virtualized.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 17:01:45 -0400
Message-Id: <6C7D77AE-2526-4396-AB6A-3385DE11DB00@tislabs.com>
References: <yj9ooa46aumt.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <AAE3F119-98A3-4618-BBFB-76F921316BD1@gmail.com> <349cb6ac-f4fe-29e5-b01f-3223b14e47de@gmail.com> <m2shteszs3.wl-randy@psg.com> <0a66024b-5cae-1abb-dc53-b11c1e35cdeb@bbn.com> <20160906220000.F1005420823A@minas-ithil.hactrn.net> <CAL9jLaYLJ2_1Dj9BtpQBa+Ta+BrGdvNpHHfFgrRxQ6SVo-6RXw@mail.gmail.com> <20160907040720.769594208DBB@minas-ithil.hactrn.net> <CAL9jLabwQQzigJF1=36dY7uWVcHSBKBmRC8DLd4pv1F1i0PZJg@mail.gmail.com> <BBA42462-C8AF-4C78-973B-3C475A9970D6@ripe.net> <CAL9jLaZ5tPtg0D1gWvURv=CXRdzWud5C+FWv4WUHeW6v2BLzvw@mail.gmail.com> <m237lax2g7.wl-randy@psg.com> <3F99CEBE-90B9-46F9-92CE-3E773933A760@shrubbery.net> <CAL9jLaamc2o7C8Lw3ZMzCUD-=F74bkyTSRCH-fA3xq5dve6eLg@mail.gmail.com> <etPan.57d1a436.41d16d8a.1a2d@virtualized.org>
To: sidr <sidr@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/jWTD7l9K64w0dmt30RH0tomJfvg>
Cc: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 21:01:54 -0000

The nice thing about working in organizations that pride themselves on openness, is the archives.

Some pointers I found.  A long history.  And this list is not necessarily complete.

NRO letters:
https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/icann_singletrustanchor.pdf
https://www.nro.net/news/nro-communication-to-icann-on-rpki-global-trust-anchor

https://www.iana.org/about/presentations/20110915-manderson-ipcertification.pdf.  Some rather detailed design info.

ICANN-NRO letters
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/gerich-to-wilson-27sep13-en.PDF
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/wilson-to-gerich-12aug13-en.pdf

IAB minutes from 2013 that record the RIR’s reports about their participation and mention the testbed
https://www.iab.org/documents/minutes/minutes-2013/iab-minutes-2013-11-05/

(IIRC, the IETF was involved as well and Richard Barnes and Allisa Cooper (?) were tasked with IETF review of the testbed design - but I haven’t found that yet.)

—Sandy, speaking as a regular ol’ working group member