IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct to Standards Track

Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org> Tue, 19 July 2011 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <terry.manderson@icann.org>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869275E8008 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:07:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.049, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZeNBA84claZt for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:07:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org (expfe100-2.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.237]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E575E8007 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:07:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.237]) with mapi; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:07:34 -0700
From: Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
To: Sandra Murphy <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:07:33 -0700
Thread-Topic: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct to Standards Track
Thread-Index: AcxGWvQ/ezOSE+lkSdKT70ZBuWy47AABU4Pm
Message-ID: <CA4C3D45.17FAE%terry.manderson@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1107191720470.6484@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct to Standards Track
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 22:07:35 -0000

On 20/07/11 7:29 AM, "Sandra Murphy" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com> wrote:


>> 
>> Which I think is sloppy behaviour.
> 
> It is a fundamental part of the proposed repository structure.
>
[..] 
> says that in times of CA key rollover, the publication point directory
> should contain two manifests and all the files from both manifests.  So
> neither manifest contains all the files names in the directory.
> 

So long as a file appears in at least one manifest, I'm good.

Randy's email lead me to think that a file (valid rpki object) can exist in
a repository and not appear in a manifest at all. Is that the case?

Cheers
Terry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email