IETF Logo Mail Archive

[sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct to Standards Track

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Fri, 15 July 2011 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6EA21F8C64 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.076, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7OssrmAQav1U for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:53:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A0C21F8C52 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:53:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=stbryant@cisco.com; l=383; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1310759628; x=1311969228; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: content-transfer-encoding; bh=ew2Jyczs+dCd1gSHCo302ahfhdR6U0yw2arlAuEFP4E=; b=B9FP5xy0AP+1jjgFhYc9dBYmr3Gp9HrcDg/FtfOuS6cK7qfNVr5FrVd6 HpRvNmnGHiaeESJp/RzZDtCkO4L0+TYL2rFgYyGKm32StIl5DPYS5XGMv 6+WXkdPOIKkAfL3CIyN4Fpjg94UirevolMAfkMsMwLLKeoHB7lRVtGyb/ o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnYHAI6aIE6Q/khM/2dsb2JhbABUmHCOf3etCoMVDwGbAYY6BJJmkFQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,209,1309737600"; d="scan'208";a="102632867"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Jul 2011 19:53:47 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.70.36]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6FJrkKv011645; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 19:53:47 GMT
Received: from stbryant-mac2.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id p6FJrjOq000982; Fri, 15 Jul 2011 20:53:46 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <4E209AC9.5040808@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 20:53:45 +0100
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sidr@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct@tools.ietf.org, "sidr-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct to Standards Track
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 19:53:52 -0000

SIDR WG,

During IESG review the there was a preference for
draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct to be Standards Track
rather than BCP.

Making this change does not require a new IETF LC.

I want to get sense of whether the WG would be OK
with this change of track.

If anyone has a reason not to change to Standards
Track, please let me know by 29th July.

Thanks

Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email