Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct to Standards Track

[Terry Manderson <[e-mail]>]

> 
> 
> A process reminder here.  Several other documents point to the
> repos-struct draft, some of them specifically regarding the file
> extensions.  Separating out the tagging into a separate document could
> mean some serious review of multiple documents.
> 

I think the question might be if the authors of repos-struct are willing to
rewrite parts (slabs?) of the document to be more in line with a PS?

As it stands now, I not so sure that repo-struct is structured as a ps,
despite many people's willingness to see it become that.

'Just because you drive a mini like a race car, doesn't actually mean it is
a race car."

T.