IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct to Standards Track

Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org> Tue, 19 July 2011 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <terry.manderson@icann.org>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BF621F8B0D for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.545
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.545 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.054, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oAv5vNQ8ToFU for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org (expfe100-1.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5260721F8B05 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.236]) with mapi; Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:03:19 -0700
From: Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
To: Sandra Murphy <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:03:18 -0700
Thread-Topic: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct to Standards Track
Thread-Index: AcxGJO19n9Qk9TdFRPaM/v1VjNkTlwAMlsM/
Message-ID: <CA4C2E36.17F9E%terry.manderson@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1107191043540.6484@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Rob Austein <sra@isc.org>, "draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct@tools.ietf.org>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>, "sidr-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct to Standards Track
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 21:03:20 -0000

On 20/07/11 1:02 AM, "Sandra Murphy" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com> wrote:

> 
> There was a brief discussion of the use of file names extensions when the
> repos-struct document came up for last call.  See the following messages:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg02281.html
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg02282.html
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg02283.html
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg02284.html
> 
> To summarize: George Michaelson spoke against extensions when we were
> considering a registry (and Terry mildly supports them), I asked George if

What I said was "and hint nicely". So happy to see it as the hint. That
hasn't changed, and create a registry if you so desire. I'm still not
comfortable in leading to a point where it is the
way (and it seems only way) an objects validation regime is chosen.

Rob's observation that the extension exists in the manifest file name is a
close approximation provided words exist as highlighted which gives clear
instruction to implementers as to
1) make the first approximation of validation regime on the filename in the
_manifest_
2) then try all others
3) give up.

T.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email