Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-sidr-repos-struct to Standards Track

[Rob Austein <[e-mail]>]

At Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:03:18 -0700, Terry Manderson wrote:
> 
> Rob's observation that the extension exists in the manifest file name is a
> close approximation provided words exist as highlighted which gives clear
> instruction to implementers as to
> 1) make the first approximation of validation regime on the filename in the
> _manifest_
> 2) then try all others
> 3) give up.

Sorry, wrong.  Attempt validation based on the filename type; if that
fails, the object is toast regardless of whether the filename appears
in the manifest or not.  Don't expect the RP to play guessing games.