Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates
Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Wed, 16 November 2011 04:39 UTC
Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0706B1F0C74 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:39:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3iawdXQPcwF2 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:39:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D0F1F0C54 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:39:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so72290iae.31 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:39:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TrPQEp0W3E/LDHgdqI758kJyDHlsLDp7rRKjPapkhbs=; b=CHsgDGbDN7fGFT3tZtMeb2XfDbCgM1NeSvhHyEo5gzFzn3BYKmX4NMnn/Z5TTau/Gh yJchPNX5weHauITM1l4j+7gV9GNrp3PnLBcLZabBRoKY8kqqN8GasaXx9AeTpKKoIINZ p/CwsLBazZ+LKNCBCI0y/2q+i1bJ4UmucHmiE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.184.202 with SMTP id ew10mr30964905igc.48.1321418393209; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:39:53 -0800 (PST)
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.231.202.142 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:39:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <E2D346C7800D704DB41ED19D90434DA6320C15DF93@ESESSCMS0358.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C49308E9E35567@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov> <7309FCBCAE981B43ABBE69B31C8D21391A45A1F85D@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <m2fwhqeq5i.wl%randy@psg.com> <CCE759E6-BEA6-433B-957A-6559C67BAD52@ericsson.com> <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD4656937791452387941@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com> <7309FCBCAE981B43ABBE69B31C8D21391A45A1FE9F@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <DCC302FAA9FE5F4BBA4DCAD4656937791452387978@PRVPEXVS03.corp.twcable.com> <7309FCBCAE981B43ABBE69B31C8D21391A45A1FEC8@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <4EC3125D.4000309@riw.us> <7309FCBCAE981B43ABBE69B31C8D21391A45A2061F@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <4EC329C6.4090600@riw.us> <7309FCBCAE981B43ABBE69B31C8D21391A45A2062E@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <4EC32EBE.6030106@riw.us> <7309FCBCAE981B43ABBE69B31C8D21391A45A20633@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <E2D346C7800D704DB41ED19D90434DA6320C15DF93@ESESSCMS0358.eemea.ericsson.se>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:39:52 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: TqrKo6jKznJoGqee_2TpxkJE9WA
Message-ID: <CAL9jLaZZ6=ASKP+U4uix31w4SrBNviOdLQDMqi4eczGv975noA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: Shankar K A <shankar.k.a@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 04:39:54 -0000
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:06 PM, Shankar K A <shankar.k.a@ericsson.com> wrote: > I would prefer signed updated over unsigned updates as Jakob suggested. > But strictly speaking, IMO we should only accept signed updates, because it's the number of AS that we add in the update that we are protecting. > By accepting unsigned update we may accept unprotected path information. > it really is, or was, the intent to permit operators of networks to decide this on their own. They MAY want to prefer unsigned/unknown/notfound/naked prefixes for certain things. It's really not up to us to say, is it? we can SUGGEST that they SHOULD prefer signed over unsigned, but in the end of the day it's on them.
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates (was: WGLC: … Sriram, Kotikalapudi
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates (was: WGLC: … Jakob Heitz
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates (was: WGLC: … Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates (was: WGLC: … Jakob Heitz
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates (was: WGLC: … George, Wes
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates (was: WGLC: … Jakob Heitz
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates (was: WGLC: … George, Wes
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates (was: WGLC: … Jakob Heitz
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates (was: WGLC: … Brian Dickson
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates (was: WGLC: … George, Wes
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates (was: WGLC: … Russ White
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates (was: WGLC: … Jakob Heitz
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Russ White
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Jakob Heitz
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Russ White
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Jakob Heitz
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Russ White
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Shankar K A
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Russ White
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Shankar K A
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Jakob Heitz
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Shankar K A
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Brian Dickson
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Brian Dickson
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Russ White
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Russ White
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Russ White
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Robert Raszuk
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Brian Dickson
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Robert Raszuk
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Eric Osterweil
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Stephen Kent
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Russ White
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Russ White
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Russ White
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Eric Osterweil
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Geoff Huston
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Tony Tauber
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Robert Raszuk
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Tony Tauber
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Robert Raszuk
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Tony Tauber
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Stephen Kent
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] Burstiness of BGP updates Jakob Heitz