IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-reqs

Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net> Sat, 12 November 2011 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <danny@tcb.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90FDB21F85FF for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 06:12:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.371
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.371 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3A8XMB3F-Ab0 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 06:12:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uu.ops-netman.net (morrowc-1-pt.tunnel.tserv13.ash1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:7:36e::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5D221F848E for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 06:12:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailserver.ops-netman.net (mailserver.ops-netman.net [208.76.12.119]) by uu.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CA81900DE; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:12:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.16.7.31] (unknown [122.147.35.3]) (Authenticated sender: danny@OPS-NETMAN.NET) by mailserver.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EF88320093; Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:12:47 +0000 (UTC)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-9--797420164"
From: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
In-Reply-To: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C49308E9E35562@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 09:12:43 -0500
Message-Id: <04E910F2-788C-47AB-BD55-D74209430CB4@tcb.net>
References: <CAL9jLaa+L-C7+Gp54BpM8FjAj+EFMabwQB9SsPW0N4QnFEfVGw@mail.gmail.com> <4297E946-980B-43C5-A01F-1F49706BC51E@tcb.net> <p06240808cad5c4d268eb@193.0.26.186> <0364A2AA-0CCF-408A-B5CB-42D7AFCAFB36@tcb.net> <p06240804cad81a9e4485@193.0.26.186> <54CED243-BDDD-45B9-AC5C-C6A97692FBF2@verisign.com> <CAL9jLaZ1GoN-iG4SWocVVhTKp5ppPOgHWcjh1J30GPnfwBPf+A@mail.gmail.com> <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C49308E9E3555C@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov> <92AA1C8B-7CDB-406E-AA83-7C1BCD83CB69@ericsson.com> <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C49308EAF8EF67@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov> <32DF728C-A96A-435D-A54E-7626C2577F04@verisign.com> <CAL9jLabdtEMJKy1eBi8JGxJDWQc2HngHWSHiuRRKc5v-=Ddk2g@mail.gmail.com> <C6A67919-B4AA-4664-A8DC-5503484B2BA8@verisign.com> <7309FCBCAE981B43ABBE69B31C8D21391A44964302@EUSAACMS0701.eamcs.ericsson.se> <CAL9jLaapE2fYHAGWvNLNVovUCk8KscfO=cqg=R2xRcMrJ_J=Hw@mail.gmail.com> <D1CCA860-6649-4B99-90AE-3EA19D44ADF3@tcb.net>, <CAL9jLaYcAfBDcBv_iZ-pFTDgkoM7rZUFJKZZ_41o5rgDvdf1pg@mail.g mail.com> <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C49308E9E35562@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
To: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-reqs
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:12:52 -0000

On Nov 11, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Sriram, Kotikalapudi wrote:

> So yes, I did consider the _prefix _ updates as is the case in BGPSEC (not updates with packing in it).


Sriram, 
Yes, I saw this, and it is a useful datapoint.  

I was looking for something more quantitative and closer to core 
ISPs v. a single BGP feed at the "edge", as previously noted.

Thanks, 

-danny

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email