Re: [sidr] Current document status && directionz

Hi Chris,

I know we already discussed this over private email, but perhaps you can 
comment on the list on the future of the requested WG adoption call for 
the ‘all resources’ applicability statement draft.

thanks!

-Carlos

On 2 Sep 2016, at 17:56, Chris Morrow wrote:

>
> Howdy SIDR peeps,
> (+bonus ops ad)
>
> Following on the Berlin meeting we were trying to accomplish two
> things:
>
>   1) get all documents related to sidr protocols into wglc and then
>   publication
>
>   2) get all documents which are more operationally focused moved
>   along to an ops group (sidr-ops or something akin to that)
>
> With that in mind there are 8 documents in the publication queue:
>   draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration
>   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs
>   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops
>   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview
>   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles
>   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol
>   draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling
>   draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis
>
> and 11 still in progress. Of the 11 left Sandy and I think they
> roughly break down like:
>
> Documents which should move to the ops group:
>   draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-rollover
>   draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases
>   draft-ietf-sidr-route-server-rpki-light - authors notified/queried 
> about this
>   draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying
>
> documents which should finish out in sidr:
>   draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol
>   draft-ietf-sidr-publication
>   draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-oob-setup - pub request in flight
>   draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-tree-validation
>   draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered
>   draft-ietf-sidr-slurm - authors recently updated
>   draft-ietf-sidr-adverse-actions - wglc imminent
>
> I think if there's no meaningful discussion on change for these
> between now and 9/16/2016 (Sept 16th) we will assume this list is
> correct. For documents in the 'move' list, if progress to publication
> happens 'good!'. For all documents in the 'stays' list:
>   1) we aim to have wglc by Seoul
>   2) publication requests started on as many as possible
>
> We plan to meet in Seoul, but not in Chicago (Mar 2017) where we
> expect the ops group to exist and meet. We can progress documents in
> SIDR after Seoul, but the WG should close out shortly after the new
> year. (or that's the goal).
>
> Thoughts?
> -chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr