Re: [sipcore] About Join and Replaces Headers:

[[e-mail]]

Hi,

> That's not surprising, since Join is an extension to 3261.
> The semantics come from the join spec.

Yes, the Join's semantics should be defined in join spec(RFC3911).

> It seems those say that when you get an invite with Join, you should 
> create a conference. And then do mixing as required. If the conferencing 

> of the new call doesn't require mixing, that's fine too.

But I really didn't find the detailed defintion for Join header, about 
when to do mixing or not, in the join spec.

Maybe, some people would say thai it is intuitionistic. But there are 
people feel that it is not intuitionistic :)

Thanks,

Gao


--------------------------------------------------------
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this communication to others.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam system.