Re: [Slim] Question about "asymmetrical language use"
Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com> Wed, 10 January 2018 00:29 UTC
Return-Path: <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: slim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90576124C27 for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 16:29:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id COCLvZtzUnfl for <slim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 16:29:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x230.google.com (mail-pg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 632CA12422F for <slim@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 16:29:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x230.google.com with SMTP id m17so7003375pgd.8 for <slim@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 16:29:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=diZJYXU6tKUe6tTJ/WML5cdbRtAyXLrXOc/bxq9ierw=; b=VyGA4isPmeiftqFHKV69ctXPtRtDnMSmgW5/dZ2wu1m1bOJgRpF53WGAJLQnhGxGm4 yjuqDhEyk2kPEUN+8ZzuWfzVrUl2rcl97PCCiSpSZfYxez01aVDEmhK5/W7y1fML5eYm PSwbtjJFbR7arH2cP/wabtX4EljPkqViqVOaL70YKdx38owf9LQfGeXUZ1m30GMB1ngM yYaSMHzjDg7Wba4esN3acmPRU+ohkZ8Q5KN2s0CCS4Co543LeicbYBLydaJb5iT/mWO5 31euZEaqRuvo5W4MTzCu4ybGFG7z6JQ2wKxJwoQOLs6ORWU0Jo9UsXvTpdMBfLiuLtCd NANA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=diZJYXU6tKUe6tTJ/WML5cdbRtAyXLrXOc/bxq9ierw=; b=uhgbvHDUCI5hLH4fLX5VO3MaMzGT1RynP/uodgFyD4ZioHKsKWL5AZcEnQXunrNK08 xPXxm7LNR7BsN4NBaIaHtnQL56OUbl28M5aMBokyZQ0iVgDwsdR5x3zWnXtu6f71UNYd LVaIVxjFDmqwFzi1PwE2Czj29UW68lPLT9jkWkDrfQnEd5WrBGUc15VDZ5tb9mSUP/Bh BB7CDwD6ex9SUCKO74KZ+3RBq74gInvLP8U6oBZZQScqSo8xNlxJZWWKP/m6rIDWIsW5 FtLaLb/XMcr7WoFkrhzjv7QkHPJHCS/qfn1Cmcs75YYhLW2v2GBar/eTZ4XR37icRUnf V+kQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mIh2OfWXLIGVkpv4n+C1Zr9lGa5mHJE6HGY3mlxzo6vn/0+mSro q3QXLLCUnrG7JXzaNAH1b/mEIcbn
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosCOXYtNyiZnMc9bWbTsaaG2ecKJeu3KZO1XNhu903E5LwfUQehV4FHiCJkFQrfj9jbMfHcEg==
X-Received: by 10.98.73.89 with SMTP id w86mr15369778pfa.31.1515544147359; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 16:29:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.118.0.140] (mobile-166-176-184-149.mycingular.net. [166.176.184.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z74sm35470415pfi.123.2018.01.09.16.29.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jan 2018 16:29:06 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (15C202)
In-Reply-To: <p0624060cd67b04b9082a@[99.111.97.136]>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 16:29:05 -0800
Cc: slim@ietf.org, Gunnar Hellström <gunnar.hellstrom@omnitor.se>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3FC9369F-DB8B-4898-B698-194C1B9FEF39@gmail.com>
References: <CAOW+2du2Cf6BhjoNQ43scbVstL+J70Myc1Mhtz0KVcTVi+vLTg@mail.gmail.com> <p0624060cd67b04b9082a@[99.111.97.136]>
To: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/slim/ayplniYBc5T3wz79oJVO6Eqz_GU>
Subject: Re: [Slim] Question about "asymmetrical language use"
X-BeenThere: slim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Selection of Language for Internet Media <slim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/slim/>
List-Post: <mailto:slim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim>, <mailto:slim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:29:10 -0000
That would help, thanks, > On Jan 9, 2018, at 3:50 PM, Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> wrote: > > The wording is intended to permit only one to be specified for asymmertical use cases, it is not intended to disallow both to be specified. This could be clarified by adding "or both": > > When placing an emergency call, and in any other case where the > language cannot be inferred from context, in an offer each media > stream primarily intended for human language communication SHOULD > specify both (or for asymmetrical language use, one or both of) the > 'hlang-send' and 'hlang-recv' attributes. > > > At 3:07 PM -0800 1/9/18, Bernard Aboba wrote: > >> In Section 5.1 of -22, I noted the following sentence: >> >> " When placing an emergency call, and in any other case where the language cannot be inferred from context, in an offer each media stream primarily intended for human language communication SHOULD specify both (or for asymmetrical language use, one of) the 'hlang- send' and 'hlang-recv' attributes." >> >> [BA] In our previous discussions, we have talked about scenarios (e.g. speech impaired, but not hearing impaired) in which it is useful to include both 'hlang-send' and 'hlang-recv' so as to accommodate user needs. Wouldn't such a scenario qualify as "asymmetrical language use"? If so, how could the user's needs be accommodated with only one of the 'hlang-send' or 'hlang-recv' attributes? >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SLIM mailing list >> SLIM@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/slim > > > -- > Randall Gellens > Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only > -------------- Randomly selected tag: --------------- > There are two kinds of light--the glow that illuminates, > and the glare that obscures. --James Thurber
- [Slim] Question about "asymmetrical language use" Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Slim] Question about "asymmetrical language … Randall Gellens
- Re: [Slim] Question about "asymmetrical language … Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Slim] Question about "asymmetrical language … Randall Gellens
- Re: [Slim] Question about "asymmetrical language … Gunnar Hellstrom
- Re: [Slim] Question about "asymmetrical language … Randall Gellens
- Re: [Slim] Question about "asymmetrical language … Randall Gellens
- Re: [Slim] Question about "asymmetrical language … Gunnar Hellström
- Re: [Slim] Question about "asymmetrical language … Gunnar Hellström