Re: [Softwires] Milestone update and closing/rechartering discussion

Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com> Wed, 14 October 2015 09:29 UTC

Return-Path: <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1614B1B2D0A; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 02:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Na8vYLpdYw8S; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 02:29:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C0751B2CF9; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 02:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CCN54486; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:29:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEML424-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.153) by lhreml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.218) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:28:35 +0100
Received: from szxeml557-mbs.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.227]) by SZXEML424-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.153]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:28:10 +0800
From: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
To: "meng.wei2@zte.com.cn" <meng.wei2@zte.com.cn>
Thread-Topic: [Softwires] Milestone update and closing/rechartering discussion
Thread-Index: AdEGDMY5GT7yov39S/SevCQUGzqBSv//8EQAgAC7d4M=
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:28:10 +0000
Message-ID: <5B8B1E9C-83B1-4895-A2BF-32C88945C716@huawei.com>
References: <E87B771635882B4BA20096B589152EF63A98C80B@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>, <OFBD151EB8.3434414A-ON48257EDE.00225863-48257EDE.00228990@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <OFBD151EB8.3434414A-ON48257EDE.00225863-48257EDE.00228990@zte.com.cn>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5B8B1E9C83B14895A2BF32C88945C716huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/softwires/_ewtTngfxP6_vsIgpFRVGO7LsQg>
Cc: Softwires WG <softwires@ietf.org>, Softwires <softwires-bounces@ietf.org>, Yong Cui <cuiyong@tsinghua.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] Milestone update and closing/rechartering discussion
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/softwires/>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 09:29:10 -0000

Dear all,

I agree with what Wei says, therefore express my support too.

And I also think the softwire WG should recharter to consider the deliverables Suresh mentioned in his email. The deployment just starts, so there are more interoperability needs.


Thank you,
Tina

在 2015年10月14日,下午2:17,"meng.wei2@zte.com.cn<mailto:meng.wei2@zte.com.cn>" <meng.wei2@zte.com.cn<mailto:meng.wei2@zte.com.cn>> 写道:


Hi all,

    As a co-author of draft-hu-softwire-multicast-radius-ext-08, I support this item for rechartering.
It is useful to deploy multicast in transition scenarios.

    BTW, I also support draft-sun-softwire-yang-04 to be a milestone.

Thanks,
Wei


"Softwires" <softwires-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:softwires-bounces@ietf.org>> 写于 2015/10/14 07:13:30:

> Hi all,
>    As we mentioned in the last meeting we are trying to wind down the
> softwire working group in an orderly fashion and trying to make sure
> that no essential documents are left out.
>
> Milestones update
> =================
>
> To start off we would like to update the milestones for the open
> deliverables. If you think that the timelines are off or if you think
> any of these deliverables are not needed, please feel to speak up.
>
> Nov 2015    Submit MAP RADIUS attribute document for Proposed Standard
>              (decide whether to include lw4o6 or not)
>
> Nov 2015    Submit MAP MIB module document for Proposed Standard
>
> Nov 2015    Adopt MAP-T deployment scenarios as a WG document
>              (Already adopted as wg item earlier. Reconfirm)
>
> Dec 2015    Submit Mesh topology multicast document as Proposed Standard
>
> Dec 2015    Submit DS-lite multicast document for Proposed Standard
>
> Jan 2016    Submit multicast prefix option document as Proposed Standard
>
> Jan 2016    Submit MAP deployment document as Informational
>
> Mar 2016    Submit softwire YANG model document for Proposed Standard
>
> Mar 2016    Submit Unified Softwire CPE document for Proposed Standard
>
> Mar 2016    Submit MAP-T deployment scenarios for Informational
>
> Apr 2016    Conclude WG
>
>
> Potential items for new milestones: Part 1
> ==========================================
>
> There are also some drafts (or draft ideas) that have seen some support
> at the meetings when they were presented or discussed. We would like to
> gauge the support for these drafts before we add them to the milestones.
>
> Softwire YANG model draft
> draft-sun-softwire-yang-04
>
> Dynamic IPv4 Provisioning for Lightweight 4over6
> draft-liu-softwire-lw4over6-dynamic-provisioning-00
>
> Lightweight 4over6 operational document
> (Idea floated - no current draft)
>
>
> Potential items for rechartering: Part 2
> ========================================
>
> There are also a few other drafts that have been presented and the
> authors have requested that they be included in the rechartering process
> (if there is one). Similar to the items in Part 1, we would like to
> gauge the support for these drafts as well before we decide to work on them.
>
> RADIUS Extensions for IPv4-Embedded Multicast and Unicast IPv6 Prefixes
> draft-hu-softwire-multicast-radius-ext-08
>
> Multicast Support for Mapping of Address and Port Protocol and Light
> Weight 4over6
> draft-sarikaya-softwire-map-multicast-04
>
> There are also a few other drafts floating around that could be of
> potential interest to softwires. If you feel that there are other drafts
> that need to be considered, feel free to propose them here as well. If
> we see a very strong need for a recharter we will work with the ADs to
> decide on the further steps.
>
> Thanks
> Suresh
>
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> Softwires@ietf.org<mailto:Softwires@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires