IETF Logo Mail Archive

[lamps] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 10 July 2024 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EED3C151547 for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 13:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=vigilsec.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KIBj81tDobpq for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 13:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60BD5C151527 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 13:57:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A4D1AB6A3 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 16:57:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [96.241.2.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66A451AB465 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 16:57:08 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6.1.1\))
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 16:56:58 -0400
References: <C61AE8CA-3692-43E0-ACE4-8BB0DEDB6D8B@vigilsec.com> <1DC465AC-81D9-4CC8-BC8A-685992CF92F4@vigilsec.com>
To: LAMPS <spasm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <1DC465AC-81D9-4CC8-BC8A-685992CF92F4@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <72BE2942-545F-406A-B473-49A5804562DA@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6.1.1)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vigilsec.com; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; s=pair-202402141609; bh=gb+CE70k8Gv+sXnXH8YrXNn5Vusx5Q3LBakihXypLyE=; b=jHC4U9WhnQTDT7zzSsmTD1N/HfLMj0YmC+61z4y5DBUNNKRoUOd7+cBYjxAg9XKsDZ3RQwIX6n2QgbFhN1YXhQA4eRXRhBzrqj+6shYloqEvZAVIf25PqN6NqYdi0q/PNSqKSV6fRzvGAYcoq3CfMfesAF0ziJhmLEz1jS+a3TKtkeBEy03fMwEDJfrCJy8UPi8S3XHl8d0ZKOqyx/a5GdtIvjPjtpgrBvaric+LMhoifgh3+bn7LSVwM6NANFzVwx5GWVIL9M5WN+TX//QGOi7IVuzha52VR/ugTs9tymw554CoA2lX9ehAKXEGyB359PEfXBSXlmZ9DhAIqa1EdQ==
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.11 on 66.39.134.11
Message-ID-Hash: 5JFGU4EOYFPSF2AUIIFLWEPGO2HSWAGP
X-Message-ID-Hash: 5JFGU4EOYFPSF2AUIIFLWEPGO2HSWAGP
X-MailFrom: housley@vigilsec.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-spasm.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [lamps] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs
List-Id: This is the mail list for the LAMPS Working Group <spasm.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/bSlkvklardJcusS3D2-VLTStX-E>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:spasm-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:spasm-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:spasm-leave@ietf.org>

The WG Last Call has raised the question about the best way to encode placeholders in the ASN.1 template.  Discussion is raging.  We have not yet reached consensus.

For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
Russ


> On Jun 20, 2024, at 2:08 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> Title: Clarification of RFC7030 CSR Attributes definition
> Authors: M. Richardson, O. Friel, D. von Oheimb, and D. Harkins
> Datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs/
> 
> Early Directorate reviews were requested, and the comments from those reviews have been addressed.
> 
> Since there are a couple of other document in WG Last Call right now, this one will go for a week longer than normal.
> 
> Should the LAMPS WG ask the IESG to publish this document as Standards-Track RFCs?  Please respond to this WG Last Call by 10 July 2024.
> 
> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
> Russ
>

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status