[lamps] Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lamps-rfc4210bis and draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

There is consensus to pass these to the IESG for publication.  The WG Chairs will work on the shepherd write-up once we get back from IETF 120.

For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
 Russ


> On Jul 8, 2024, at 10:13 AM, Russ Housley <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> A revision was posted today that seems to address all of the WG Last Call comments.  One reviewer asked for a few more days for review.  At that time, the WG Last Call was extended to 12 July 2024.  Other reviewers, please make sure that your comments have been addressed in the most recent revision.
> 
> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
> Russ
> 
> 
>> On Jun 19, 2024, at 3:13 PM, Russ Housley <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> I have only seen comments from me so far.  On one hand, the vast bulk of the changes are from the already approved -updates documents.  On the other hand, rfc4210bis adds support for certificates that contain KEM public keys.  Please review!
>> 
>> Russ
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jun 5, 2024, at 11:50 AM, Russ Housley <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Title: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure -- Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)
>>> Authors: H. Brockhaus, D. von Oheimb, M. Ounsworth, and J. Gray
>>> Datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc4210bis/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis/>
>>> 
>>> Title: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure -- HTTP Transfer for the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP)
>>> Authors: H. Brockhaus, D. von Oheimb, M. Ounsworth, and J. Gray
>>> Datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-rfc6712bis/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Should the LAMPS WG ask the IESG to publish these two documents as Standards-Track RFCs?  Please respond to this WG Last Call by 20 June 2024.
>>> 
>>> For the LAMPS WG Chairs,
>>> Russ
>>> 
>> 
>