Re: [spfbis] Call for adoption: draft-kitterman-4408bis

[Scott Kitterman <[e-mail]>]

On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 12:03:08 AM Hector Santos wrote:
> 3) To avoid high potential conflicts, draft-kitterman-4408bis has to 
> start by removing talk about DKIM:
> 
>     In the interval since that statement, DKIM (see [RFC4871] was
>     developed and achieved wide deployment.  Both Sender ID (as the
>     protocol defined in RFC 4405, RFC 4406, and RFC 4407 was named) and
>     DKIM target "message content", as described in [RFC5598], while SPF
>     targets the "transit-handling envelope".  The success or failure of
>     the Sender ID portion of this IESG experiment should be evaluated
>     relative to DKIM.
> 
> DKIM is not SPF - two different models of reputation vs deterministic 
> methods, respectively. Such integration needs to be done outside the 
> SPF framework and specification.

The separate draft the resolved the end of the so called experiments didn't 
exist when I wrote that.  It's OBE by that draft, so it'll go away.  Don't 
worry about it.

Scott K