IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Call for adoption: draft-kitterman-4408bis

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 14 June 2012 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CDB11E80AF for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.273
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.273 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.325, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YfK0UsbzIHQk for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F145911E80D3 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so342508obb.31 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AqFjxyuTTAzyqRL8wUKJtt5/QQ7lq0ZEdKTkL3wNPCI=; b=zdryFS3n5LjTeqFgQLNsvTqY8jyrbxvMWlpi2LfKMNgmc5zSNBVTXDhFLsZ9phjHF5 UfnCEbTSPDj056JrXD6/SMBnlyaUPy7xGGtsjqlcjcukGWzCuSzbFUnV/uVD80qhG8px 9byZSnvKeUsWJmhJAufTrDwKeFiXqIyHEMPNaOD932kJnVVMrrGGgev6lhPLX4bc3voF D7cM6HtwF181LJ1LGB3aGEFW0nrV24XEgeWleMdZnez6s39OaCJw/pk0y+IG/YxQGqxU SbmI0lUzXYFLVpJqNP+yojjpnvmoALicDk0KKu5nbABBRXwNPHKX/QH/4Y05ZHfAxaYf BjmA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.169.174 with SMTP id af14mr26601047oec.13.1339633927564; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.66.201 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2092795.BIeCdPn4ql@scott-latitude-e6320>
References: <20120611160740.GL11684@crankycanuck.ca> <2092795.BIeCdPn4ql@scott-latitude-e6320>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:32:07 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwY-dAmQARcd81OxFcjJLmr9FoVM+jOEhohqpsgFahEKXQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec54c539261ac3f04c263d4d5"
Cc: spfbis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Call for adoption: draft-kitterman-4408bis
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:32:08 -0000

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Scott Kitterman <spf2@kitterman.com> wrote:

> As requested, I've posted a -01 to revive the draft.  See:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-kitterman-4408bis-01.txt
>
> It's the same as 00 except I removed a paragraph the discussed resolution
> of
> the experiment, since that's already been addressed and added review of WG
> issue status to the TODO section that was already present.
>
>
Some housekeeping to note for later:

Appendix C probably needs to be updated, especially the bit about the IESG
note.

Also, when we did DKIM it was suggested that the resolved errata be listed
by their numbers.  I don't recall if any of the ones you've got there were
tracked as errata on the RFC Editor site or just at openspf.org.  Should
they be opened as RFC Editor errata if they were only external?  Are there
any external tracking numbers that would be useful to add?  It helps people
evaluating the document to have this sort of thing as a sort of checklist
to ensure nothing's getting missed.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email