IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Draft adopted (was: Call for adoption: draft-kitterman-4408bis)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Mon, 18 June 2012 21:40 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED7311E80C1 for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:40:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.403
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.403 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.195, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fpPV714hQFsD for <spfbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5902511E808F for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:40:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lbbgo11 with SMTP id go11so5320737lbb.31 for <spfbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=OZ0+8LvJOpKBN7UPPXyNzd5sgPwNyOjVdqAJdCJPV9g=; b=P73vw48BB1cyBwiefvskl32jhK43BWc0Sq/kkEsz1e3CDGvS2TiJYPwiJxzpn5ktiX TKMzEdNXYLffwiJAbRN7vAIAq2NyA11thPcV4pzHlnSmdKlsD36CsDVn+1cqUCBpyqdO 8kN+UJJMWStJK+/NuYSH0EbspBQRY9zGWzTxVWBme5p+ERi7OCYwrePRSmVrSDGWxUAc TbuwfBEoy5P0HjbMyl+HesjSqm9tZMM9Wxt1QDUrEKXRAhBJ7xz9f0rJJTbUDtzEjXO+ BH73t3g/SX8YK1sQ4IuVBcalzi8ubczqtsU8jg0wt0cB7TGRHlWXu7zyAZfN3nCLnZcw 6DHA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.112.36.225 with SMTP id t1mr7154675lbj.67.1340055610137; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.89.3 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120618212337.GD32683@mail.yitter.info>
References: <20120611160740.GL11684@crankycanuck.ca> <20120618212337.GD32683@mail.yitter.info>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:40:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYP2h3cSK4n6Kip1VpDLW5Bbmy3-9FwMs1N-hzAyBvp_g@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e0cb4efe2f4c9f1de104c2c602da"
Cc: spfbis@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Draft adopted (was: Call for adoption: draft-kitterman-4408bis)
X-BeenThere: spfbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SPFbis discussion list <spfbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/spfbis>
List-Post: <mailto:spfbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spfbis>, <mailto:spfbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:40:12 -0000

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>wrote:

> The -experiment- process was, despite some frustration over the pace,
> actually fairly successful I think, and so we're going to take a
> similar approach here.  We're going to start by describing issues
> first.  Therefore, I'd appreciate it if people took the next week to
> describe any issues they have _without engaging in debate_ over the
> issues.  Then we can prioritise issues and bring them to the list in
> manageable chunks.  This will not be as simple as the case of
> -experiment- because there are protocol issues at stake, but your
> chairs think we can focus discussion this way and come to some
> conclusions successfully.
>
>
Does this refer to issues not already present in the tracker?

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email