Re: [spfbis] Call for adoption: draft-kitterman-4408bis

[Commerco WebMaster <[e-mail]>]

Makes sense, thank you for moving the process forward. +1

Alan M

On 6/11/2012 10:07 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> Now that the document concluding the SPF experiment is well on its way
> to publication, it is time for the WG to turn its attention to our
> other chartered work item: a standards-track document for SPF.  Note
> that an IPR disclosure ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1698/ ) has
> been filed for RFC 4408.
>
> We would like the working group to consider adopting
> draft-kitterman-4408bis as the basis for such a specification.  As the
> charter explicitly mentions that draft as a possible basis for work,
> it is the presumptive candidate for adoption.
>
> If you have any objections against adoption of the draft please send
> them to the mailing list before 18 June.  Please include an outline of
> what the alternative draft will be like or an alternative draft.  If
> there is such an objection, we will wait one additional week for that
> alternative draft to materialize before taking a decision.
>
> The date, 18 June, gives us one month prior to the date for WG agendas
> to be posted for Vancouver.  We have requested a 30 minute meeting
> slot in Vancouver.  If by 18 July we do not seem to have any need for
> further discussion in Vancouver, we will cede the time.
>
> Best regards,
>
> SM&  AS
>