Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 24 May 2023 15:32 UTC
Return-Path: <daniele.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C0BC14CE2B for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2023 08:32:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hM922BzyhCtd for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2023 08:32:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63EE5C14CE4F for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2023 08:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-62383441211so5867586d6.0 for <spring@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2023 08:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1684942267; x=1687534267; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=CqE42U6AzqQjsq5M0gEI6iU2C5PnCy2rFVAz1cpoKrA=; b=WUh4IMYQWzFzzcnuNgXHH29lkUXvff+szXyAm8Vfq4gW3K6WDESbaICVnC4w5QeU92 aN3Si9u2kbqZmzRAPAFbeNb40fSFc8cKgnphj+zku2DQKp/ulqyLgrhYxt3difSN0nu3 14hbRZS2H+oU9P5rGci+z8l2Tt0/9qGox8gnnzWjQpq1YlSg9Qo6S92PKqLnGdt8CrBK 2l7eAKCVLUbT8W00zpCpEUBqujixxpgHaLd0jj5yp/dVUe9nq13SyslDYSQdIjsxpw1n OmsRtPIzXSy/NrdDjagDBz5tw+PQDq8d2rEi1s51XGf+KVXgqKIdYlEPshv4pJIaeYvw 51yg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1684942267; x=1687534267; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=CqE42U6AzqQjsq5M0gEI6iU2C5PnCy2rFVAz1cpoKrA=; b=bpL2hzUiTmNc4osSwTjDdeer7TBBNaTLsxqGg3hsUzsmxu28tw/0vIccYaD0K/bwTI HrgPSBGd7c54I/slHdzKAsvppTY/OzM2k0DE7tV+GWC60t4d0nRvyUY/7Am9HWqzWXQ7 nb4iBNb1Kc/FFcLrX6wH4ngGESVV968QxSQ/YRuPfg1tL56bcB+waUC2svwhYE863dCl myn29G/vTRG+GoEZVXtnP3kAV5J6smh/ElhsMWLIDyAPybVtJWZqOy4kFY4K/x+afgSz U2ex4fOy+u2PH02P3EjvYUZUj6axmi/TlAcOaieXEd63UdhXW1VhG74AmtE3WS82Hmgz PaIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDw/LCOgZ1lcFx6z4fMs2BdoEF1eR5hkIEdOxkXWui1eViwY1Cm4 mYpGlE+ki0mq7UDL0Z6kD/YW8GRlen+pT/w9Vb2AXXQtlpo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4YSzA5TsC/Rv9iB2PeLIuKMVCNGUm6VVH2WpMnDCRHExiT23fw2Ar7sA9JTZ46/F7Q5ThtKgHEbcksN2ErC1Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:410:b0:623:638e:aa33 with SMTP id z16-20020a056214041000b00623638eaa33mr30438787qvx.6.1684942266912; Wed, 24 May 2023 08:31:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <168424587271.45431.10014516596562429177@ietfa.amsl.com> <SJ0PR04MB8391E5969B27B5360140092BCD7F9@SJ0PR04MB8391.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <1EDBB134-BE9C-4874-9CCC-513BD6D100D4@nokia.com> <8d03ca72-cc5c-6ea4-69b7-102a9b14a078@joelhalpern.com> <CAB01kMhORQCxFYYWvst_3CCKWUH==F-+U2AcydKw_OFmE4yBCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMEEA1q2pJ6KdWT937QoYLYuTW5FbGOhNL9oOejj6m+t6w@mail.gmail.com> <CAB01kMhPqx-haSn03QjK0y7XQd4Yw6v1trMbsb7ZEHCo=2iY=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMEqZHDWW+25mg6hnErzZYXd-pMeaQpis9QWEv4kJ52A1g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMEqZHDWW+25mg6hnErzZYXd-pMeaQpis9QWEv4kJ52A1g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 17:30:55 +0200
Message-ID: <CAB01kMidwGQdOtqsuXN3rur62Dw6sOEDoBKVX2boS-Pf9i915A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004954ef05fc7231d5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/PkZxQ1D4l-ma4fwOd-JDBjNEoZQ>
Subject: Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 15:32:07 -0000
Hi Robert, i wouldn't just focus on the guaranteed bandwidth (which in any case has been working with RSVP-TE and this solution will provide something as good as that), but also on the other key requirements that SR-CS can meet (like correctly identified in the draft): - Predictable E2E TE paths with predictable bidirectional delay - E2E recovery (i.e. protection and restoration) - Path integrity - Data plane remaining up while control plane is down These requirements are not less important that the guaranteed bandwidth. Moreover, pardon me for asking, why intense admission control would be a problem in the network ? Cheers, Daniele On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 4:35 PM Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote: > > If you want to have a network slice for remote surgery probably you > > need something more reliable, but otherwise it's a good enough solution. > > Spot on ! > > And that is my main point. We are reusing notion of completely different > technology like SONET/SDH containers. > > And that is to create only a poor approximation of it assuming very > strong/tight admission control to the entire network, no multicast > which can spoil the game at any replication node and with huge pray and > hope that there is going to be no unplanned and unaccounted traffic in the > underlay. > > See till today I still meet folks who believe reading marketing slides > that RSVP-TE (incl. GB) does actual data plane reservation. > > Here we are going step further and claim that SONET/SDH can be sold when > running over IP :) > > Cheers, > R > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 3:23 PM Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ietf@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Robert, >> >> i had in mind something with the same capabilities/characteristics of >> RSVP-TE. >> The same problem has been addressed for decades by operators using LDP >> for 90% of the traffic and RSVP-TE just for a small portion of the traffic >> (e.g. phone call back in the days). >> With mix of admission control and proper planning it is possible to >> achieve decent performances. If you want to have a network slice for remote >> surgery probably you need something more reliable, but otherwise it's a >> good enough solution. >> >> Cheers, >> Daniele >> >> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 11:27 AM Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote: >> >>> Hi Daniele, >>> >>> Could you kindly elaborate on what level of "guaranteed bandwidth" you >>> expect SR to provide ? Especially in the context of _circuit_ emulation ? >>> >>> And even if you build the mechanism to account for bandwidth on a per >>> class of service basis and use controller to push your policies everywhere >>> in the network it is still only done in the control plane. >>> >>> So how are you going to assure that in your default IGP topology there >>> is no traffic of a given class (external or internal or accidental) which >>> would impact the promise of your emulated circuits ? >>> >>> This draft in section 1 makes IMO a very dangerous illusion that you can >>> accomplish analogy to SONET/SDH in IP networks. I do not agree neither that >>> this is the case nor that it should be the case. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Robert >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 9:15 AM Daniele Ceccarelli < >>> daniele.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Joel, >>>> >>>> the phrase "circuit style" attracted my attention and reviewed the >>>> draft. >>>> I think segment routing should provide good support for proper traffic >>>> engineering (guaranteed bandwidth, recovery, path constraints etc.) hence i >>>> believe the draft should be adopted. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Daniele >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 5:13 PM Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In case it is not clear to folks, the chairs are particularly >>>>> itnerested in hearing from folks who are not authors of the document, but >>>>> have opinions on whether this is good work for the WG to undertake. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you, >>>>> >>>>> Joel >>>>> On 5/19/2023 10:11 AM, Andrew Stone (Nokia) wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As co-author, also support adoption. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> Andrew >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From: *"Rokui, Reza" <rrokui@ciena.com> <rrokui@ciena.com> >>>>> *Date: *Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 7:29 AM >>>>> *To: *IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> >>>>> <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>, >>>>> "draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy@ietf.org" >>>>> <draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy@ietf.org> >>>>> <draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy@ietf.org> >>>>> <draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy@ietf.org>, >>>>> "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org> >>>>> <spring-chairs@ietf.org> <spring-chairs@ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" >>>>> <spring@ietf.org> <spring@ietf.org> <spring@ietf.org>, "Rokui, Reza" >>>>> <rrokui@ciena.com> <rrokui@ciena.com> >>>>> *Subject: *Re: [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has placed >>>>> draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state "Candidate for WG Adoption" >>>>> *Resent-From: *<alias-bounces@ietf.org> <alias-bounces@ietf.org> >>>>> *Resent-To: *<andrew.stone@nokia.com> <andrew.stone@nokia.com>, >>>>> <praveen.maheshwari@airtel.com> <praveen.maheshwari@airtel.com>, >>>>> <zali@cisco.com> <zali@cisco.com>, <rrokui@ciena.com> >>>>> <rrokui@ciena.com>, <cschmutz@cisco.com> <cschmutz@cisco.com> >>>>> *Resent-Date: *Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 7:29 AM >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> You don't often get email from rrokui@ciena.com. Learn why this is >>>>> important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *CAUTION:* This is an external email. Please be very careful when >>>>> clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for >>>>> additional information. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As co-author, I support the adoption. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Reza >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From: *IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> >>>>> <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> >>>>> *Date: *Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 10:04 AM >>>>> *To: *draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy@ietf.org >>>>> <draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy@ietf.org> >>>>> <draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy@ietf.org>, spring-chairs@ietf.org >>>>> <spring-chairs@ietf.org> <spring-chairs@ietf.org>, spring@ietf.org >>>>> <spring@ietf.org> <spring@ietf.org> >>>>> *Subject: *[**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has placed >>>>> draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state "Candidate for WG Adoption" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state >>>>> Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Joel Halpern) >>>>> >>>>> The document is available at >>>>> >>>>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy/__;!!OSsGDw!PrF5MLj2VoK47BuWO76oeewImBaGMafe294qNONXqhmq7i57ixXHdL_zK2azlh1DsID1fgczKQ2sDmGvgCW8AZU$ >>>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy/__;!!OSsGDw!PrF5MLj2VoK47BuWO76oeewImBaGMafe294qNONXqhmq7i57ixXHdL_zK2azlh1DsID1fgczKQ2sDmGvgCW8AZU$> >>>>> [datatracker[.]ietf[.]org] >>>>> >>>>> Comment: >>>>> This starts a two week adoption call for the subject draft. Please >>>>> speak up >>>>> if you support or object to WG adoption. Two notes: 1) WG adoption is >>>>> the >>>>> start of the process. The basic question is whether you agree that the >>>>> subject is worth the working group time to work on, and whether this >>>>> represents a good starting point for the work. 2) Please include >>>>> explanation >>>>> for your view. Yes or no are not very helpful answers, as this is not >>>>> a vote >>>>> but an evaluation of support and concerns. Thank you, Joel (for the WG >>>>> Chairs) >>>>> >>>>> We expect to close this call at the end of May, 2023. >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> spring mailing list >>>>> spring@ietf.org >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> spring mailing list >>>> spring@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring >>>> >>>
- [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmutzer… IETF Secretariat
- Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmu… Christian Schmutzer (cschmutz)
- Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has pla… Rokui, Reza
- Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has pla… Andrew Stone (Nokia)
- Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has pla… Joel Halpern
- Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has pla… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has pla… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)
- Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmu… Mankamana Mishra (mankamis)
- Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmu… N.Leymann
- Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmu… Luay Jalil
- Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmu… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has pla… Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
- Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmu… Bernier, Daniel
- Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has pla… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has pla… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has pla… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has pla… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has pla… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has pla… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has pla… Joel Halpern
- Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has pla… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmu… Eduard Metz
- Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmu… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmu… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmu… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmu… Martin Horneffer
- Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmu… Christian Schmutzer (cschmutz)
- Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmu… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmu… Ted Pelas Johansson
- Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmu… Ketan Talaulikar
- Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmu… Dongjie (Jimmy)