Re: [spring] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Dear WG,

strong support from my side.

While I would not advise to run an SR enabled network to mainly carry 
circuit-style traffic, I do think this approach might be a valuable 
technology to further consolidate multi-service network, esp in cases 
when plain packet traffic seriously exceeds the circuit-style traffic.

Bets regards, Martin

Am 16.05.23 um 16:04 schrieb IETF Secretariat:
> 
> The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state
> Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Joel Halpern)
> 
> The document is available at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy/
> 
> Comment:
> This starts a two week adoption call for the subject draft.  Please speak up
> if you support or object to WG adoption.  Two notes: 1) WG adoption is the
> start of the process.  The basic question is whether you agree that the
> subject is worth the working group time to work on, and whether this
> represents a good starting point for the work. 2) Please include explanation
> for your view.  Yes or no are not very helpful answers, as this is not a vote
> but an evaluation of support and concerns. Thank you, Joel (for the WG Chairs)
> 
> We expect to close this call at the end of May, 2023.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring