Re: [spring] [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

[Daniele Ceccarelli <[e-mail]>]

Hi Joel,

the phrase "circuit style" attracted my attention and reviewed the draft.
I think segment routing should provide good support for proper traffic
engineering (guaranteed bandwidth, recovery, path constraints etc.) hence i
believe the draft should be adopted.

Cheers,
Daniele

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 5:13 PM Joel Halpern <[e-mail]> wrote:

> In case it is not clear to folks, the chairs are particularly itnerested
> in hearing from folks who are not authors of the document, but have
> opinions on whether this is good work for the WG to undertake.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Joel
> On 5/19/2023 10:11 AM, Andrew Stone (Nokia) wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> As co-author, also support adoption.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
> *From: *"Rokui, Reza" <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
> *Date: *Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 7:29 AM
> *To: *IETF Secretariat <[e-mail]>
> <[e-mail]>,
> "[e-mail]"
> <[e-mail]>
> <[e-mail]>
> <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]"
> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>,
> "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>,
> "Rokui, Reza" <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
> *Subject: *Re: [**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has placed
> draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
> *Resent-From: *<[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
> *Resent-To: *<[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>,
> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>,
> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>,
> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
> *Resent-Date: *Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 7:29 AM
>
>
>
> You don't often get email from [e-mail]. Learn why this is
> important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
>
>
>
>
>
> *CAUTION:* This is an external email. Please be very careful when
> clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for
> additional information.
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> As co-author, I support the adoption.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Reza
>
>
>
> *From: *IETF Secretariat <[e-mail]>
> <[e-mail]>
> *Date: *Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 10:04 AM
> *To: *[e-mail]
> <[e-mail]>
> <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
> *Subject: *[**EXTERNAL**] The SPRING WG has placed
> draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
>
>
> The SPRING WG has placed draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy in state
> Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Joel Halpern)
>
> The document is available at
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy/__;!!OSsGDw!PrF5MLj2VoK47BuWO76oeewImBaGMafe294qNONXqhmq7i57ixXHdL_zK2azlh1DsID1fgczKQ2sDmGvgCW8AZU$
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schmutzer-spring-cs-sr-policy/__;!!OSsGDw!PrF5MLj2VoK47BuWO76oeewImBaGMafe294qNONXqhmq7i57ixXHdL_zK2azlh1DsID1fgczKQ2sDmGvgCW8AZU$>
> [datatracker[.]ietf[.]org]
>
> Comment:
> This starts a two week adoption call for the subject draft.  Please speak
> up
> if you support or object to WG adoption.  Two notes: 1) WG adoption is the
> start of the process.  The basic question is whether you agree that the
> subject is worth the working group time to work on, and whether this
> represents a good starting point for the work. 2) Please include
> explanation
> for your view.  Yes or no are not very helpful answers, as this is not a
> vote
> but an evaluation of support and concerns. Thank you, Joel (for the WG
> Chairs)
>
> We expect to close this call at the end of May, 2023.
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>