Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping
"Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com> Thu, 05 December 2019 16:50 UTC
Return-Path: <ddukes@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E4412021D; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 08:50:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=RJwtugxS; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=SAwTclfJ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J86doWgBDO9a; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 08:50:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D246012012D; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 08:50:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=15261; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1575564606; x=1576774206; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=3e/l5Klj8uUi7eBwpJVfT7RN0G4osZZyJQiQ0kbUMNE=; b=RJwtugxS5P0cq2AXUx8a+a380Ky5OSzeNmn64HbYYVtSaj/tYqCq5CPO eQnh6HZudyM4nTNogJpMewGXGSng5Nb1ZmCufwh84alJXu0VZB2ReiikP R95xrJksPjfZvCOEyZIh2fcWgSdiENBFOjxwBIweKg/+Kr/UGhWFBGm6P E=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:yOYzfxLmcZM/PzRPpdmcpTVXNCE6p7X5OBIU4ZM7irVIN76u5InmIFeCtKd2lFGcW4Ld5roEkOfQv636EU04qZea+DFnEtRXUgMdz8AfngguGsmAXEH3Mf3ndAQxHd9JUxlu+HToeUU=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CrAAAqNOld/5ldJa1lHQEBAQkBEQUFAYFrBwELAYEbL1AFbFggBAsqhCuDRgOKfJYBhGKBLhSBEANUCQEBAQwBARgBDAgCAQGEQAIXgXwkNQgOAgMNAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FNwyFUwIBAwEBEBEdAQEsCwEPAgEIPwMCAgIlCxQRAQEEDgUigwABgXlNAy4BAgwDo1oCgTiIYHWBMoJ+AQEFgTUBgRSCPRiCFwMGgTYBhRuGexqBQT+BOCCCHi4+gmQBAQKBSUWCYzKCLI00gm2FT4lLjxMKgi6HH447G5omhD+STJFiAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFUAzSBWHAVOyoBgkFQERSMZoNzhRSFP3QBgSeQQAEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,282,1571702400"; d="scan'208,217";a="671112142"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 05 Dec 2019 16:50:05 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (xch-aln-013.cisco.com [173.36.7.23]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xB5Go5pd012571 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 5 Dec 2019 16:50:05 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 10:50:05 -0600
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 11:50:04 -0500
Received: from NAM10-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 10:50:04 -0600
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=bk8VB0YAIU1LZkwOyl2xTaTeweOjKItxGBCe6Upt1TfShQvBKuLugL8xvrNkGEfuvJh92e/hLy66+ZkjjwR3yYbzRqtE2+piRUE+KS3AS1W6hKmBSZl7Prufwf0O0iBI4TahDgve1dAxZzEpOPdSL78TBiOYDH6dhl6A9f9lM6DNV3iCjZ03BPTyOaxG8jE9fqgwoZfLbSqFkEBJriC0B6ln58rK9Ceeu63aMx9E7lPHhgExRLMR19GZ68jQwWySJDduE/MG3laISf+R3+cW04gib8PxSLaDM7p924hr7vWQCv6nZIGNVSCXHh4ma5S36tYqMf7yxMHasE72u1rtsQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=3e/l5Klj8uUi7eBwpJVfT7RN0G4osZZyJQiQ0kbUMNE=; b=S7yGwUiLR/BdpRyWZVrUFo0aeXAoT3rFaX8tefxqAY3/ZEEykMz8JLfM+Vk6dqliJvuUIlxhBCDPY03MTbXbYwv7XGy7deTnTSPvlqCKp0fSoFudLZVRUrkcZrIghiyZadTXEC4w63Nb95pvaIigdKi4JOAYDhubj8KcgRNxqWcI+M26kG5WL1aHQF6nFXN7fHBcWD0+4ZaRXyA/TQSbpxkGxV5mRqJadztmGA/GZYh9Ogq5FyqXKd+hXS4IH+q5s77Dq+glJZ0vHt5u9PpWMPkwINl6sXOqvaJ9jSm/9srnfxdCwsOSRBxZlK+8GRnXg2Oxjj9peNElLFtNBkHSWw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=3e/l5Klj8uUi7eBwpJVfT7RN0G4osZZyJQiQ0kbUMNE=; b=SAwTclfJaeAieXkYP8KftZOC/baV1ZJny7uHCl9GguV3rN9H2Vbx36iSdV26NhtfkwBZCDIletA68Ux3QtB3nObxIxu/gA79F1oTdfb5d+KUsFHsPL3Kj2/dWBh2WomBHSRSD1WqeI90ekpkBaB4raXCdj+blCiS6WDmDY7dxNI=
Received: from BN7PR11MB2594.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.246.159) by BN7PR11MB2739.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (52.135.252.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2516.14; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 16:50:03 +0000
Received: from BN7PR11MB2594.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c72:fa12:757e:cca3]) by BN7PR11MB2594.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::c72:fa12:757e:cca3%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2516.014; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 16:50:03 +0000
From: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping
Thread-Index: AdWqwAHVKZEn9oMNQKewBt9OvTlYXgAzAekA
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 16:50:03 +0000
Message-ID: <3AD3BD11-8C34-41FE-B88F-49A9F2561D78@cisco.com>
References: <BN7PR05MB56998A05469327E759B5B671AE5D0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN7PR05MB56998A05469327E759B5B671AE5D0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ddukes@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0cc:1008::f1]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 16ec5ca7-cd61-4b29-0b66-08d779a32cbb
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN7PR11MB2739:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN7PR11MB273912B35B1A8FA87260EA8EC85C0@BN7PR11MB2739.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:6790;
x-forefront-prvs: 02426D11FE
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(346002)(136003)(366004)(39860400002)(396003)(189003)(199004)(316002)(6512007)(6486002)(2906002)(81156014)(81166006)(8676002)(54906003)(54896002)(4001150100001)(229853002)(5660300002)(478600001)(14454004)(8936002)(6506007)(4326008)(66476007)(25786009)(2616005)(86362001)(11346002)(53546011)(99286004)(186003)(91956017)(71200400001)(71190400001)(966005)(102836004)(76176011)(64756008)(66556008)(76116006)(36756003)(66446008)(66946007)(33656002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BN7PR11MB2739; H:BN7PR11MB2594.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Pi2yWN1AzPmIa+QPhJ17613Yn1OEZZBh7LAXKYl/W3xJe4OrJ4MR/lglSVbNU1KF2M3fPYMFVpl/DRPX2+b8UgSRwAVGg10W1E+8dYMZ3oyfn8vlufhW01qwMRwtzVsnlFkbcrxxfjlQPD0UnbDeA1Uggg17kV4YERb74hKReb3h7cFPrG9bHHVuhY4lFNRsyLpz9yczhJTTieeY2JAynKSfTzVvzNHsHwbvdd5JnIPFZeoWKoXVEL+BjLCyABdP4OTGhUYo1x44GR+bnYsCV2OK471tW3YTDfDOcqpD3LsLQjyTRx3zjVhLa1c3MAO+IgoTwQf6/RH++aA6RdP0Rt9NlsIT3eqZv9a4XLqjod1e53vftOS4mLptqk7saozEgB1cOao4Ve8sAZSAgLAOB4beHvyAJbJUmeko6834RDLuMV64B+kmXTlht8YdXS8F46RJ+qGwXnvXvhZ4zb/10OrOTYuA/P5aqlB77MEKD1c=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3AD3BD118C3441FEB88F49A9F2561D78ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 16ec5ca7-cd61-4b29-0b66-08d779a32cbb
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Dec 2019 16:50:03.1481 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: WqfUbZrGlQEYWhsNnp1GJwhjUfHO2rpXDy2icRTDGgDl6aMRptyikCCAlhHy6wW2xgvbsf5zvqoJtqz/38S/Gw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN7PR11MB2739
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.23, xch-aln-013.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/V9BnqbXEgEdLbSRCfXQK3OcDdNA>
Subject: Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 16:50:09 -0000
Hello Ron, I believe this is the fifth time you have raised this comment in 6man and/or spring. The comment has been addressed in earlier iterations. Let me recap. With the PSP behavior, the SRH is only removed by the node identified in the destination address field of the IPv6 header. That destination address was placed in the SRH by the SR Source node, fully expecting the behavior. Thanks Darren Iterations: [2019-09-06] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/7zMgIwEY9AipZCCGO9KnT2CGH3o [2019-09-27] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/4_Slu3kkHwduZZPFJJmRUkmoTVo [2019-10-14] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/u536YH4tv7kKRq_b9_x9gBYpO9c [2019-10-21] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/4pikRli_HSECun9AbwfpmOF5KLI [2019-12-04] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/oDWLbRDqKCaF5Xa-QvKY6mk_D5E On Dec 4, 2019, at 11:37 AM, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: Pablo, It seems to me that the following are equally controversial: * A transit node inserting a Routing header * A transit node removing a Routing header We have agreed to move discussion of RH insertion out of the Network Programming draft and into another draft. Shouldn’t discussion of RH removal be treated similarly. This comment applies to Penultimate Segment Popping (PHP) in the Network Programming draft. Ron Juniper Business Use Only -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Segmen… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Se… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Se… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Se… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Se… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Se… otroan
- Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Se… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Se… otroan
- Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Se… Fernando Gont
- [spring] We don't seem to be following our proces… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… otroan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… otroan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Tom Herbert
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Enno Rey
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Enno Rey
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Bob Hinden
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… otroan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Sander Steffann
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Tom Herbert
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Sander Steffann
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Bob Hinden
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… otroan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Tom Herbert
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… otroan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Andrew Alston
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Andrew Alston
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… otroan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… otroan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Se… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Se… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Ole Troan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Andrew Alston
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Sander Steffann
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… otroan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- [spring] Separating issues (was Re: We don't seem… Suresh Krishnan
- [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8200 … Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [spring] Separating issues (was Re: We don't … Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Se… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Se… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Se… Tom Herbert
- Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Se… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… bruno.decraene
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… bruno.decraene
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Mark Smith
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… bruno.decraene
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Penultimate Segment Popping and RFC8… Fernando Gont
- [spring] Non-final destination address (was Re: P… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [spring] Non-final destination address (was R… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] Non-final destination address (was R… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [spring] Non-final destination address (was R… Fernando Gont