Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our processes (Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping)

Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Thu, 05 December 2019 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AEB120073; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 14:09:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=fXR979TY; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=FfpT9c2a
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id genfr_cxjqiQ; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 14:09:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 957321201DB; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 14:09:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108161.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xB5M8572025835; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 14:08:56 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=F2JhnvUWAGf43cMwraK4wr1pVH0hr6wMMA+NJaEtmPY=; b=fXR979TYnU4869YMkAgPellwcSJ7Fq9RKcB0wiSpJizqrwgeYvtdDIhNe+gvXwX82rci 1O9LFV0EciOqHtuy9glML5Nbg0f4XX+wvGquN2J03czFf99qnHGALcJ1v0PwwvrSfW2f JI5ZtQvp3keD79tuuPd9pnKqOWxOsbwgmKLSRGBlBjtGcSNbzsMUATAl3cDz/ZqG7xTU Rx4iyaY8anJIxknBb/1q36jnfpfnhWLXYP4uf0iH0B+PTka6Rzwy3SuXIl03C4wbHgeS ZoHyZbzwZUSkPcdC9Yndh+LGRx2Zdv+M16NBoTW8Zmfetlw30aZgMUQPy+PCV8Fl0IM9 og==
Received: from nam02-cy1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cys01nam02lp2052.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.37.52]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2wpfd32vut-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 05 Dec 2019 14:08:56 -0800
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=gzK3nXqwHiLwxGrXWw7cef3ybMluFoqvNHhbzVqFNJUwOjfyKD2Iy+yVC2lBSf7tigCCr/N+cSKIUAo7P8f1yhMf7psL6IkCMb8nci3RjHRI7om5d2Fw7zaj8qxmq9GImYLq35ACn0wtF545Vxfn6rnvXvcoDBtPhdVkNm+3WJwOptpgd+g/Ni33cczkJ/1+fGh7GLDku56Dgfy3PCPCBDWVl4sV77dhoBjEIfSDk/wnbnTAaxcAlq/jmuZ2EoJMz9Kq0lSDNvPq1rHeYJrdbvBSZCp7HdmCl/7NBOSHXTcXp9QexVo5QoMVgDfafI15aikojDHmgeadAgs20Kv7iA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=F2JhnvUWAGf43cMwraK4wr1pVH0hr6wMMA+NJaEtmPY=; b=O1CyT6uzyEvEia03SBEiFl7McpHrOzi1Hr8Y5Y9uHt5TptLjkptjd1bXJSi+XKGguM4hjjl3V4Yxxev+sUOiFkBLAk4b4HQ/2vr7sPnmmsM0zZfYjgTY3ar4NSAML8fFiiHTMbad7+4hRJdjscQ+v5xn6NMY5XgJizbijXWKYxjMFlrDgkteLpc/Npn9I1gXEV/WPIuxbCp2rExOCCfQ6mZUd0t4HhN4nCJJmIyqmjJkgZoISQSGTx1ti1eKyFZb5g7bR3EspabQ4xfxh05VKZn30sowpnLq6phjT8v+Dv2ONhlg8+K1suV0pCswxgx7WD7FR7maTOwco/QK8EBs8Q==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=F2JhnvUWAGf43cMwraK4wr1pVH0hr6wMMA+NJaEtmPY=; b=FfpT9c2ajP0NwL1nHQxsZqbShm16hkbTBkWwkXS7yS3KHVD3xS/Hdmsft6CnP4bjUjEGXkN/J3vzumNSvGYz4T6sNK2isw12PgSx2VtUipvXql1a21owQUt2qykFHeNSI6uM22kAFs+oNZzbVkb/jtxwtVM36VQuy6q4hapr8yw=
Received: from BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.176.28.88) by BN7PR05MB4580.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.133.223.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2516.4; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 22:08:54 +0000
Received: from BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::185e:d297:6499:4987]) by BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::185e:d297:6499:4987%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2516.003; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 22:08:53 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "otroan@employees.org" <otroan@employees.org>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
CC: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>, "int-ads@ietf.org" <int-ads@ietf.org>, rtg-ads <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: We don't seem to be following our processes (Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping)
Thread-Index: AQHVq7OB3WyX+KNnYEeH6fGTwOpEUKesEh6AgAAEkkA=
Content-Class:
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 22:08:53 +0000
Message-ID: <BN7PR05MB56993D964D47CD871AD8C17FAE5C0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BN7PR05MB56998A05469327E759B5B671AE5D0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <3AD3BD11-8C34-41FE-B88F-49A9F2561D78@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB569946D6AA5C6B78AFC05F6BAE5C0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <8DEDE597-B7B0-48F5-959E-69757315C2AC@employees.org> <BN7PR05MB56996FFC117F512EEA04AFC8AE5C0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <4FAB68A3-C533-471D-94D0-3F6EB1F32FC1@employees.org> <1e36a492-5931-02de-cf85-63339522b13a@si6networks.com> <F6DD2C7C-DBBF-4B48-B890-3C86005FB9CF@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <F6DD2C7C-DBBF-4B48-B890-3C86005FB9CF@employees.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=True; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Owner=rbonica@juniper.net; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2019-12-05T22:08:51.4525091Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=Juniper Business Use Only; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Application=Microsoft Azure Information Protection; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=83fdc180-c4d3-4f24-ba4f-e7bf79cf3766; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Extended_MSFT_Method=Automatic
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.3.2.8
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [66.129.242.14]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f4be5102-acd9-4b2c-4d60-08d779cfb76f
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN7PR05MB4580:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN7PR05MB45806374C196C38A90B8D841AE5C0@BN7PR05MB4580.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 02426D11FE
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(39860400002)(136003)(376002)(396003)(366004)(189003)(199004)(51444003)(13464003)(102836004)(11346002)(71190400001)(74316002)(81156014)(54906003)(316002)(8676002)(110136005)(53546011)(66556008)(71200400001)(5660300002)(86362001)(81166006)(64756008)(66446008)(8936002)(52536014)(4326008)(26005)(66946007)(6506007)(186003)(478600001)(33656002)(9686003)(55016002)(966005)(14454004)(76116006)(25786009)(305945005)(7696005)(99286004)(76176011)(2906002)(229853002)(66476007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN7PR05MB4580; H:BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f4be5102-acd9-4b2c-4d60-08d779cfb76f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Dec 2019 22:08:53.7371 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 25uRos4kCWCeIYfQIlEeyHrqNhzGdhAjbAjDxDyxc5uSVW5Z+rS3tCKoD0EJgKG/YflOLOzW9yAZifaCw+iUOg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN7PR05MB4580
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-12-05_08:2019-12-04,2019-12-05 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 clxscore=1011 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1912050180
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/uHFyiXqstLmEdCexnaZQMv1vdlM>
Subject: Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our processes (Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping)
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 22:09:03 -0000

Peace Gentlemen,

For the purpose of this thread, I think that we have all of the information that we need. Consensus regarding header insertion and removal is "evolving". 

We need to let that evolution progress, and not make any assumptions regarding its outcome.

                                                        Ron


Juniper Business Use Only

-----Original Message-----
From: otroan@employees.org <otroan@employees.org> 
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 4:42 PM
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Cc: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>et>; SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>rg>; 6man <6man@ietf.org>rg>; int-ads@ietf.org; rtg-ads <rtg-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping)

Fernando,

>>> Point taken. Could you comment on the current state of WG consensus?
>> 
>> The working group session in Singapore ended with what appeared to be a view that we should continue work on both documents (Mark's and the Voyer draft).
>> For the state of the wg consensus, I haven't checked with Bob, but I think he will agree with it being classified as "evolving".
> 
> I polled you about this decision
> (https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv
> 6/12Qwp_eeQT2EmbUrSxBLL5HTcnM__;!8WoA6RjC81c!QH6T9eu4QEGAh1tVtPAiXW2SjsZMxfQdUYen3nv2CPDS4DWlFeKu7c4TwztzwnbH$ ), and you never responded.

Sorry, which decision is that supposed to be?

> Suresh (INT AD) clarified this one list, here:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6
> /Db6_SGfmeIDzaE56Ps5kUDCYEzY__;!8WoA6RjC81c!QH6T9eu4QEGAh1tVtPAiXW2Sjs
> ZMxfQdUYen3nv2CPDS4DWlFeKu7c4Tw1iPjJAl$
> 
> Suresh noted that there wasn't consensus call, even at the f2f meeting 
> (not to mention that the list was never polled in this respect).

Right, neither of these two documents are adopted as working group documents. And perhaps a more correct phrasing above would be that "The working group session in Singapore ended with what appeared to be a view that work could continue on both of these documents".

> I would say that it seems we have not been following the processes 
> that should be followed. This has happened repeatedly over time, for 
> this very same topic. The process seems to be biased, and thus unfair 
> to the rest of the wg participants.

Which process are you talking about? Is that documented in an RFC?
You seem to take it on yourself to represent the "rest of the wg participants", but from my perspective it looks like a few very loud voices.
Perhaps we should let others speak up, if there is anything more to be said on this topic.

Ole