IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [straw] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-dtls-srtp-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com> Tue, 22 March 2016 05:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rmohanr@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: straw@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: straw@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943D412D0C9 for <straw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 22:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w46gfaCYmq7E for <straw@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 22:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D83F12D094 for <straw@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 22:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1257; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1458623765; x=1459833365; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=MtDqNcwSSeF+7qGuwpOin2iIU15bT0tySmRlLEp82GU=; b=eEO5akr0IiaMOuqk3dqvCF05T1SsaGzOxrXCfRpnq4qi7K5bWUBj4Pnz 1ARQ+6pDVEJZP+Y8NqpIx/mfCbQyACTD/zikqr8Qbr9NC2gW2tWTrKhJZ CdUd9BaNFghQkdYQEGakz0Qdazs7XEjqHm/uPMwu0thQsIT4oOa0AwYIO 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AaAgCr1PBW/5hdJa1egzOBTQa4K4IPAQ2BcIYNAoE3OBQBAQEBAQEBZCeEQQEBAQQ6PwwEAgEIEQMBAh8FCzIdCAIEDgWIJ74TAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGIpiihIBBJdXAY4DjwePBQEeAQFCgjCBNWqJCH4BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,375,1454976000"; d="scan'208";a="250605311"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Mar 2016 05:16:04 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-016.cisco.com (xch-rtp-016.cisco.com [64.101.220.156]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u2M5G3Ua004048 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 05:16:04 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-017.cisco.com (64.101.220.157) by XCH-RTP-016.cisco.com (64.101.220.156) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:16:03 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-017.cisco.com ([64.101.220.157]) by XCH-RTP-017.cisco.com ([64.101.220.157]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:16:03 -0400
From: "Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Thread-Topic: [straw] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-dtls-srtp-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHRg/ntO6rZrCJaUk6hR6VG4IidQA==
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 05:16:02 +0000
Message-ID: <D316D3F7.55B12%rmohanr@cisco.com>
References: <20151201045818.23491.19134.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E63559A7-6A37-496C-AAD9-426AB697FD65@nostrum.com> <D2851411.4B35B%rmohanr@cisco.com> <DB9B999A-DAF0-440B-BDD4-445368AFFCE2@cooperw.in> <DAE78890-C8B2-42DE-BCC3-A994CB9AF668@nostrum.com> <1D498CDA-C8B6-4215-A718-7C5302B5CF2D@cooperw.in> <01E4CF3B-6C31-4A97-8155-8DC06443A7C2@nostrum.com> <A6B3CA82-DC74-48AB-80B7-EBF1462A964E@nostrum.com> <D2C25ED1.4E4DA%rmohanr@cisco.com> <23C852C2-1B96-4739-91ED-8B4C0FF97279@cooperw.in> <D314CB23.5573B%rmohanr@cisco.com> <9F61F2A3-355F-4053-B110-3899CF337A4E@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <9F61F2A3-355F-4053-B110-3899CF337A4E@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.1.160122
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.196.92.70]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <ECA03CF7990D8142BB2B0E5D5AF18269@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/straw/Wpto2vgOTXeerLRXP3dexdzG1Vc>
Cc: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, "straw@ietf.org" <straw@ietf.org>, "christer.holmberg@ericsson.com" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [straw] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-dtls-srtp-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: straw@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Sip Traversal Required for Applications to Work \(STRAW\) working group discussion list" <straw.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/straw>, <mailto:straw-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/straw/>
List-Post: <mailto:straw@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:straw-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/straw>, <mailto:straw-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 05:16:06 -0000

Hi Ben,

-----Original Message-----
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Date: Tuesday, 22 March 2016 at 12:08 AM
To: Cisco Employee <rmohanr@cisco.com>
Cc: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, "straw@ietf.org" <straw@ietf.org>,
"christer.holmberg@ericsson.com" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [straw] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on
draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-dtls-srtp-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

>>NEW:
>>B2BUAs may be deployed for address hiding or media latching [RFC7362],
>>although TURN is more often used for this purpose and media latching
>>is not
>>recommended due to its security properties. Such B2BUAs are able to
>>perform their
>>functions without requiring termination of DTLS-SRTP sessions i.e.
>>these B2BUAs need not act as DTLS proxy and decrypt the RTP payload.
>
>I think the statement that TURN is more often used for media latching is
>at least somewhat aspirational. But I'm okay with that aspiration :-)

:) Agree. There are more B2BUAs out there in field doing latching than
people using TURN.
But I think there is no harm in saying this way.

Ram
>
>(The reality probably varies by market type and the "purpose" of the
>latching, but that sort of detail would only be a distraction here.)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email