IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Taps] IETF planning

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Thu, 22 October 2015 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E461B3B1A for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 439TefDeDY01 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out4.uio.no (mail-out4.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:10::15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D4E91B3B17 for <taps@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx3.uio.no ([129.240.10.44]) by mail-out4.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1ZpKt3-0001qM-MM; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 20:46:53 +0200
Received: from 173.179.249.62.customer.cdi.no ([62.249.179.173] helo=[192.168.0.101]) by mail-mx3.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) user michawe (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1ZpKt3-0003VF-6D; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 20:46:53 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_44C7A2B1-D0EF-4175-9F05-0DEF7CF51FDE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <64271754-EED2-4322-BB0E-51CB66365682@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 20:46:52 +0200
Message-Id: <3AD6FE1A-7E9E-4A30-89DA-6D4870623C24@ifi.uio.no>
References: <64271754-EED2-4322-BB0E-51CB66365682@gmail.com>
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
X-UiO-SPF-Received:
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 2 msgs/h 1 sum rcpts/h 7 sum msgs/h 4 total rcpts 34239 max rcpts/h 54 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, TVD_RCVD_IP=0.001, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 535002BA4D448274272A9A4D9A9565C3B584FAB7
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 62.249.179.173 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 1 total 1903 max/h 14 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/93Tsrmn3mbc6hvNUknxbyQhQUHw>
Cc: "taps@ietf.org" <taps@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Taps] IETF planning
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Transport Services <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 18:46:58 -0000

> On 19. okt. 2015, at 20.44, Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Folks-
> 
> So, we have these two docs and a rough agreement that they are complimentary.  Gorry suggests that they both progress as responsive to milestone 1:
> 
>>  I suggest the two docs against the first milestone will help us
>> make  progress towards the next milestone faster. (Assuming we can keep
>> the two aligned, which seems quite doable). I can see also how the  docs
>> are useful to different people. I'd like to see both mature and provide
>> inputs to move forward.
> 
> Is there agreement on this?  I’ve heard no objections.  Assuming so, we should move on.

=> So, I’d like to ask for WG adoption of draft-welzl-taps-transports

Cheers,
Michael

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email