Re: [Tcpcrypt] v3 of the charter

Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com> Thu, 01 May 2014 00:10 UTC

Return-Path: <bascule@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCF21A0984 for <tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YcnjkZCoL8gQ for <tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x235.google.com (mail-vc0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCE21A0A02 for <tcpcrypt@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hy4so3159728vcb.26 for <tcpcrypt@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=FnHaOmdI9ni3Pa7ZyoTn+8U5U81mJmQCyTRqWRa51x0=; b=qZoeEZVQgTrB09/nNXTta1o96N1jgTzrLfib+9irTq1oiOYk1pFYy6xaWuuz9VNFr9 dUOEzEH6h4JDNcOkYwHTGICR77JtqnNS7WShXCy9yXbaQUPlKL9jDTo54Lui2ulRG2us thLNwp5MVoqCC+U5WxdsyMXMJTCRBmGYxLA7Ba7kcAX5RwlqKfrDsjwfuE/DGnN81CPG 9gFv6kGYb45zTwXMuDQJTDjKJ7whDx+4YjxM9PVJb8Af38zVyDFX4QIzOw5g5JhFty9a x+2kGO6Y913kKxx40/J0tqt2jNNDFKna303KXxAED75pid72hTTxWlFcfc44uit1yovm J7Iw==
X-Received: by 10.52.173.165 with SMTP id bl5mr4794399vdc.13.1398903033933; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.58.243.202 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <536167CC.8010703@isi.edu>
References: <536099A0.30900@it.uc3m.es> <23862F2E-9D56-4651-9202-FC676D15720B@netapp.com> <07C2D017-9342-4742-990C-7D3BC795049F@netapp.com> <536157E1.2060202@fifthhorseman.net> <53615A40.9050903@isi.edu> <536165C6.20909@fifthhorseman.net> <536167CC.8010703@isi.edu>
From: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:10:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHOTMV++FjrSWLrHPJcfDy455HmACYM4GLgU6qOc7NfCRbcpQg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec51b9cfd69b5e404f84b7e1b"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpcrypt/-MtXxXGuypM4GeU2JD0weMUzBFE
Cc: Marcelo Bagnulo <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>, "tcpcrypt@ietf.org" <tcpcrypt@ietf.org>, "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Subject: Re: [Tcpcrypt] v3 of the charter
X-BeenThere: tcpcrypt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for adding encryption to TCP." <tcpcrypt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpcrypt>, <mailto:tcpcrypt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpcrypt/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpcrypt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpcrypt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpcrypt>, <mailto:tcpcrypt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 00:10:38 -0000

On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> wrote:

> They're also both clients because they issue the initial (non-ACK) SYN. So
> they're both - which is why most TCP protocol specification docs tend not
> to use the term client/server.
>

Are you attempting to describe TCP hole punching in a NAT firewall? If
that's the case, it's a race, and one side will win...

-- 
Tony Arcieri