Re: [Tcpcrypt] v3 of the charter

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Wed, 30 April 2014 21:15 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A371A08B5 for <tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:15:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xFRQ-0fALAMD for <tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2AE1A0639 for <tcpcrypt@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s3ULEq51024582 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <536167CC.8010703@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 14:14:52 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, Marcelo Bagnulo <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
References: <536099A0.30900@it.uc3m.es> <23862F2E-9D56-4651-9202-FC676D15720B@netapp.com> <07C2D017-9342-4742-990C-7D3BC795049F@netapp.com> <536157E1.2060202@fifthhorseman.net> <53615A40.9050903@isi.edu> <536165C6.20909@fifthhorseman.net>
In-Reply-To: <536165C6.20909@fifthhorseman.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpcrypt/N0dzeWDzP4yvVXyYlKtwOuzzIXY
Cc: "tcpcrypt@ietf.org" <tcpcrypt@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Tcpcrypt] v3 of the charter
X-BeenThere: tcpcrypt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for adding encryption to TCP." <tcpcrypt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpcrypt>, <mailto:tcpcrypt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpcrypt/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpcrypt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpcrypt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpcrypt>, <mailto:tcpcrypt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 21:15:28 -0000

On 4/30/2014 2:06 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 04/30/2014 04:17 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
>> On 4/30/2014 1:06 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>>> TCP is bidirectional, but the handshake is asymmetric: one party
>>> listen()s and accept()s, and the other party connect()s.
>>
>> TCP supports simultaneous open too. In which case, who's the client and
>> who's the server?
>
> In the simultaneous open case (does anyone actually use that in
> practice?), both parties already know something about their peers (at
> least, they know who they want to connect to).  From the perspective of
> fingerprinting concerns, that suggests that they should both be treated
> as servers, not as clients.

They're also both clients because they issue the initial (non-ACK) SYN. 
So they're both - which is why most TCP protocol specification docs tend 
not to use the term client/server.

Joe