IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tcpcrypt] v3 of the charter

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Thu, 01 May 2014 00:38 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC611A0981 for <tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bkbOHwPQGcYA for <tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from darkstar.isi.edu (darkstar.isi.edu [128.9.128.127]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91781A096A for <tcpcrypt@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.184.196] ([128.9.184.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by darkstar.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s410c8NN015836 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53619771.3040503@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 17:38:09 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tony Arcieri <bascule@gmail.com>
References: <536099A0.30900@it.uc3m.es> <23862F2E-9D56-4651-9202-FC676D15720B@netapp.com> <07C2D017-9342-4742-990C-7D3BC795049F@netapp.com> <536157E1.2060202@fifthhorseman.net> <53615A40.9050903@isi.edu> <536165C6.20909@fifthhorseman.net> <536167CC.8010703@isi.edu> <CAHOTMV++FjrSWLrHPJcfDy455HmACYM4GLgU6qOc7NfCRbcpQg@mail.gmail.com> <536191F4.2020303@isi.edu> <CAHOTMVJr_YX6r4qGOfCMSNE5WWDtmU5QVmowxBPJ+GkvD2ugGQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHOTMVJr_YX6r4qGOfCMSNE5WWDtmU5QVmowxBPJ+GkvD2ugGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpcrypt/XywYvVHQtY9OdLYb-izapzk8CVw
Cc: Marcelo Bagnulo <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>, "tcpcrypt@ietf.org" <tcpcrypt@ietf.org>, "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Subject: Re: [Tcpcrypt] v3 of the charter
X-BeenThere: tcpcrypt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for adding encryption to TCP." <tcpcrypt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpcrypt>, <mailto:tcpcrypt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpcrypt/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpcrypt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpcrypt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpcrypt>, <mailto:tcpcrypt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 00:38:42 -0000

On 4/30/2014 5:20 PM, Tony Arcieri wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu
> <mailto:touch@isi.edu>> wrote:
>
>     Simultaneous open existed long before NATs.
>
>
> It seems like another piece of minutia you are eagerly embracing long
> before defining the rest of the protocol. How about addressing the 99.9%
> case first?

If by minutia, you mean "supports existing TCP capability", yes.

I don't see why any extension to TCP should do otherwise.

But yes, let's see what happens first - I don't see this as a 
non-starter if the corner cases are at least all addressed.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email