Re: [tcpm] poll for adoption of draft-ananth-persist-02

Mahesh Jethanandani <mahesh@cisco.com> Tue, 23 March 2010 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <mahesh@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C01E3A681C for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.469
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.469 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DlqMVEzDHZBB for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:12:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com (sj-iport-4.cisco.com [171.68.10.86]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08C33A69AE for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:10:56 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-4.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAAOTqEurR7Ht/2dsb2JhbACbKXOkIJkvhH0Egx6GYw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,296,1267401600"; d="scan'208";a="104470918"
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com ([171.71.177.237]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Mar 2010 17:11:16 +0000
Received: from [10.21.107.174] (sjc-vpnasa-942.cisco.com [10.21.107.174]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2NHBGAK024673; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:11:16 GMT
Message-ID: <4BA8F634.6010707@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:11:16 -0700
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mahesh@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco Systems Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Heffner <johnwheffner@gmail.com>
References: <C304DB494AC0C04C87C6A6E2FF5603DB47DF997794@NDJSSCC01.ndc.nasa.gov> <1e41a3231003221441s57d77a53m255fbe8c00cb370@mail.gmail.com> <4BA7FFA2.4020800@cisco.com> <1e41a3231003221915n45b07a07v3a0ace6a879bb4e9@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1e41a3231003221915n45b07a07v3a0ace6a879bb4e9@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcpm] poll for adoption of draft-ananth-persist-02
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:12:06 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 3/22/2010 7:15 PM, John Heffner wrote:

> I'm pretty sure Section 7 describes automatically aborting connections
> because they are in the persist state for some period of time.

Since your concern is about the wording of section 7 you can help us
reword it to remove any doubts that you might have.

Do you want to do that?

- -- 
*Mahesh Jethanandani*
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLqPY0AAoJEP9ZPWIqKBmiVssH/2Lp7nO/3c36Ehjbs6hWL6HW
gq2fGRz/SR6dm0ZR1551LfpCNSuC3Jn53DYjGILSFr2m2kzrh9KSFgjKEzBHssE0
8WYih30ufdTv6M9XYGhrlLq5uX5bgDAlEJP4NfmjS4B9BgW5DP95rG3PN+r/jCCb
mLFIuOjhGyZfCYEniZHnT+TpyPS71msaLzKrXCFnWHY1Y1ybaHz8lHp9oBykTIpv
AwE90PHSRCWP/RHYmr9d7hAagJ6Xmuruh4KSomn3BsbZHzxpOAQ8SkdHXAuPcv9u
4iBIQtXlz5X7EseJcORxHPV6e2OISizjkcIBxZ9qOo3hr/w0HteW50hZMbCyGjg=
=PAr7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----